Re: [logs] Logging standards?

From: edward.j.sargissonat_private
Date: Mon Oct 29 2001 - 14:27:24 PST

  • Next message: Sweth Chandramouli: "Re: [logs] Logging standards?"

    I'm going to stick my oar in.
    I think that people are getting confused in what privacy means in terms of
    who your personal information is protected from being disclosed to.
    
    (IANAL but I've studied NZ Privacy law (and a bit of US law) at
    University).
    
    In a time sharing system a user can have no expectation of privacy from
    having their data/usage patterns/whatever from being known by the *system
    administrators*.
    In NZ, when signing up to a system a user would be told this up front but
    it's fairly obvious.
    
    However, the user probably does have an expectation of privacy from having
    that data spread to anybody else (bar the system owner/law enforcement).
    
    So the fact that you (as a user) might spend a lot of time reading
    loganalysisat_private is known by your sysadmin but he/she should
    have no right to go tell anybody else about that.
    
    (In NZ, we have a number of information privacy principles enshrined in
    law. One of them is that an owner of data can't use that data for purposes
    that the provider of the data wasn't told about when the provider of the
    data gave that data).
    
    So you see both sides of the argument are actually right.
    
    Edward
    
    
    
    
    Rebecca Kastl <rkastlat_private> on 30/10/2001 09:59:46
    
    To:   Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
    cc:   loganalysisat_private
    Subject:  Re: [logs] Logging standards?
    
    
    On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Shane Kerr wrote:
    
    > > I think the privacy you refer to is from "other users", but honestly
    > > how is it possible that you and the Systems Admins and Auditors would
    > > or could not know each other more intimately.
    > >
    > > So - I ask again - what real expectation of privacy is there in a Time
    > > Sharing System, other than by potential agreement between the users?
    >
    > This isn't the same question that you asked originally.  You simply said
    > that users should have no expectation of privacy, because the scheduler
    > has to track what processes are doing.
    >
    > To me, this is akin to saying you have no reason to expect
    > confidentiality from your physician because he has to know what ailments
    > you suffer from.  Hogwash!  How can I *prove* that my doctor isn't
    > sending reports of my various STD's to the press?  Well, I can't.  That
    > doesn't mean I should expect my doctor to publish my private
    > information.
    
    I disagree with you, and don't think you are presenting a valid argument or
    acccurate analogy.
    
    First off, there can be no expectation of privacy on a multi-use
    (time-sharing) system.  In adddition to the reasons stated by Todd Glassey,
    the system owner is able to monitor as they wish without having to
    explicitly
    state they are doing so.
    
    If you walk into a business (your employer, for instance), whether or not
    you
    feel it is reasonable, that business has a right to conduct video
    surveillance
    on you, monitor your access to the building, and monitor your access to
    various building areas (e.g. use of proximity/swipe cards, security logs,
    etc.).
    
    In businesses where such systems are implemented, you cannot have any
    expectation of privacy (except in the restrooms -- maybe).  The same goes
    for
    a system implemented in the course of business (or some other capacity).
    You
    are granted use with the implicit understanding that you may be monitored.
    Don't think so?  Walk into a record store at the mall -- you're being
    surveilled.
    
    
    As Todd asked, "what real expectation of privacy is there in a Time Sharing
    System, other than by potential agreement between the users?"  There isn't.
    
    
    --Rebecca Kastl
    
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
    which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
    material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
    taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
    entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
    this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
    computer.
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 29 2001 - 15:02:50 PST