Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court

From: todd glassey (todd.glasseyat_private)
Date: Wed Dec 05 2001 - 12:01:39 PST

  • Next message: todd glassey: "Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court"

    Absolutely! Especially for source archival purposes. WORM Drives are perfect
    for this. Or burn it to CD's.
    
    T.
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Patrick Harbauer" <patrick.harbauerat_private>
    To: "'Rick Magill'" <RSMAGILLat_private>; "loganalysis"
    <loganalysisat_private>
    Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 6:39 AM
    Subject: RE: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court
    
    
    > Is it reasonable to write logs to write-once media?
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Rick Magill [mailto:RSMAGILLat_private]
    > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 5:50 PM
    > To: loganalysis
    > Subject: Re: [logs] Due Diligence for Admission in Court
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >           I don't have a clue what the US laws may be with respect to the
    > use
    >           of logs in court trials. But I do have a brother in law who is a
    >           Judge here in Canada. Last year we were having a beer and I
    > brought
    >           up this topic as well as the more general use of 'electronic'
    >           evidence in trials and how could any court put any significant
    >           weight on it given how easy it is to forge or tamper with, etc.
    >
    >           His reply, after finishing a good chuckle, is that they don't
    put
    >           all that much weight on it. What they do put weight on is the
    >           character of the individual who is presenting the evidence and
    >           their assurance that the record was accurate. After some
    > reflection
    >           his point was obvious - records were even more easily tampered
    > with
    >           in days gone before systems existed. All that systems have made
    >           easier is generating volumes of it.
    >
    >           In terms of situations where data streams or logs are tampered
    > with
    >           perhaps the question is better put to IT people - how can you/we
    >           testify to the accuracy of something when we know it can be
    >           tampered with and have we taken all steps possible to prevent
    the
    >           tampering.
    >
    >           Regards
    >
    >           Rick
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    > For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    > For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    >
    >
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: loganalysis-unsubscribeat_private
    For additional commands, e-mail: loganalysis-helpat_private
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Dec 05 2001 - 12:24:07 PST