[logs] Re: syslog-sign implementation?

From: Tom Perrine (tepat_private)
Date: Fri Dec 06 2002 - 10:34:09 PST

  • Next message: Tom Perrine: "Re: [logs] SDSC Secure Syslog"

    >>>>> On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 22:28:42 +1100 (Australia/ACT), Darren Reed <avalonat_private> said:
    
        DR> This URL surfaced on another list I'm on and is relevant:
    
        DR> http://www.eurobsdcon.org/papers/mietus_presentation.pdf
    
        DR> Darren
    
    Cool,  I've looked at it.  It seems to be a good implementation of
    syslog-signed.
    
    Now, how do we reconcile syslog-signed with syslog-reliable?
    
    And timestamps, don't forget the timeststamps.
    
    --tep
    _______________________________________________
    LogAnalysis mailing list
    LogAnalysisat_private
    http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Dec 06 2002 - 20:06:48 PST