RE: [logs] Syslog payload format

From: Rainer Gerhards (rgerhardsat_private)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 08:24:03 PST

  • Next message: Rainer Gerhards: "RE: [logs] Syslog payload format"

    Hey, hey... I DIDN'T (meant to) suggest to go to the IETF. I really
    meant this. Let's get something together, first and THEN have a look on
    how to carry it over to the IETF or whereever (personally, I feel the
    glibc guys would be the best first target ;))
    The reference to the IETF was really only meant to see a real world
    sample that discussion lists really work. Sure, IETF is slow, but that
    is not due to email communication but the broader reach and the more
    (comercial) interests in there [my point of view].
    Regarding a draft document, I see many good suggestions here and would
    volunteer to write at least part of it. At least I now get the feeling
    that things begin to take off, hopefully not only a new year's
    > > I think the list serves quite well as long as it comes to 
    > discuss pro 
    > > and cons. But we would need to start on a document, have an editor 
    > > that will merge changes into them once there is consensus. Sounds a 
    > > little like IETF, but in general that scheme seems to work...
    > <tbird throws herself on hand grenade>
    > >>if<< someone else writes a first draft, i will be happy to take over
    > ownership and editing of the document.  i may even be willing 
    > to find out what needs to happen to release it as an 
    > informational or best practices RFC once we're happy with it.
    > but as those of you waiting for documents from me know, the 
    > project becomes much more likely to reach conclusion if 
    > someone else does the draft!
    LogAnalysis mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 03 2003 - 18:57:50 PST