Karl Vogel wrote: > > Bennet Todd wrote: > > I think we're in agreement that we can't hope to cover every possible > > need a priori, there needs to be some open-ended flexibility for people > > to add tags where the existing lexicon doesn't cover their needs. > > Could we do something similar to the mail-header custom of prepending > "X-" to non-blessed headers? Let the namespace do the work? That would introduce incompatibility with every single tag/value format there is today, and there's quite a few of them. IMO, it'd be better to prefix the registered tag names. Personally, I liked the "R_" prefix idea. -- Mikael Olsson, Clavister AB Storgatan 12, Box 393, SE-891 28 ÖRNSKÖLDSVIK, Sweden Phone: +46 (0)660 29 92 00 Mobile: +46 (0)70 26 222 05 Fax: +46 (0)660 122 50 WWW: http://www.clavister.com _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysisat_private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jan 04 2003 - 10:44:15 PST