Rainer Gerhards(rgerhardsat_private)@Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 09:47:03PM +0100: > > The QoS is an interesting point. But back to my question: DID syslog > work under attack or not? Any experience or samples on that? I mean > real-world ones... Yes, mine did. My production networks have a "front" network for internet traffic, a "middle" net for server-to-server traffic, and a "back" net for administrative traffic. Syslog flowing over the administrative net (over TCP) was fine, even when the front-net might have been melting down (I'm not saying it was, that might be private information). OBTW, we'd probably be better with just a front-net and a mid-net, the extra burden of maintaining a third network doesn't really seem to be paying off (IMO, others around here may disagree). -- Nate Campi Wired UNIX Operations TerraLycos DNS Operations Perl - The only language that looks the same before and after RSA encryption. -Keith Bostic _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysisat_private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jan 27 2003 - 14:49:05 PST