RE: [logs] NetIQ Vigilant Log Analyzer?

jason_wakeat_private

Brian, also take a look at Addamark - www.addamark.com - they claim massive 
scalability, compressed storage, and support for any log source.

Jason

>From: "Michael Fimin" <michaelfiminat_private>
>Reply-To: "Michael Fimin" <michaelfiminat_private>
>To: brian_anonat_private, 
>loganalysisat_private,eric.hinesat_private
>Subject: RE: [logs] NetIQ Vigilant Log Analyzer?
>Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 11:26:04 +0300
>
>I would also suggest you another NetIQ's competitor:
>Aelita Software (http://www.aelita.com) - namely their InTrust product 
>(http://www.aelita.com/products/InTrust.htm). This product is more scalable 
>than others.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Hines [mailto:eric.hinesat_private]
>Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 5:59 PM
>To: 'Brian Anon'; loganalysisat_private
>Subject: RE: [logs] NetIQ Vigilant Log Analyzer?
>
>Brian:
>
>Bad, bad idea.. Take this with a grain of salt as its just my oppinion,
>but they presented their product at SANS 2003 and was very unhappy and
>not impressed at all. The only thing I came away from that with was
>satisfaction over the free lunch. The product lacks a great deal of
>support for third party products (currently only supports 2-3 as I
>recall). You will need to hire an XML programmer or learn the language
>yourself to write the support agents required for Vigilant to work. The
>product seemed to have a great deal of maturity to go through. We kept
>asking if they supported the things in their brochure they listed and
>mentioned that in small print, it did state that XML agents would need
>to be written by the customer for that particular support. It was our
>oppinion after seeing all the deficiencies that they launched their
>marketing campaign a bit prematurely. Their competition is just too far
>ahead. Check out:
>
>eSecurity, Inc (http://www.esecurityinc.com)
>And
>NetForensics (http://www.netforensics.com)
>
>
>There are so many commercial solutions out there that offer you far more
>for your money, I'd wait much longer for Vigilant to mature.
>
>.1 cent
>Eric Hines
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: loganalysis-adminat_private
>[mailto:loganalysis-adminat_private] On Behalf Of Brian Anon
>Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 8:09 AM
>To: loganalysisat_private
>Subject: [logs] NetIQ Vigilant Log Analyzer?
>
>
>Anyone here have experience with NetIQ's Vigilant Log Analyzer?
>
>I'm thinking about using this product to centralize audit logs and
>report on
>events.  I'd appreciate any feedback from others who have used this
>before.
>
>Brian
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
>
>_______________________________________________
>LogAnalysis mailing list
>LogAnalysisat_private
>http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
>
>_______________________________________________
>LogAnalysis mailing list
>LogAnalysisat_private
>http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
>
>_______________________________________________
>LogAnalysis mailing list
>LogAnalysisat_private
>http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

_______________________________________________
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysisat_private
http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis