Re: [logs] comparison chart/ magic Quadrant or something about centralized l ogging systems..

From: durnieat_private
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 12:22:28 PST

  • Next message: Kevin Hanrahan: "Re: [logs] comparison chart/ magic Quadrant or something about centralized l ogging systems.."

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    I would vehemntly disagree, everything in my enterprise that can log
    is logging into my SEM product. I keep 6 months of data in my very queryable
    storage facility... Currently I have over 35 million events that I can
    query and correlate through...
    
    Chris Kirschke
    Silicon Valley Bank
    
    On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 07:40:24 -0800 Kevin Hanrahan <kevinhat_private>
    wrote:
    >You are probably right that he would get more hits, but the hits
    >he gets
    >may not help him with the problem he is trying to solve.
    >
    >The companies that fall under "Security Event Management" (or Enterprise
    >Security Management, or Security Information Management, depending
    >on
    >who you ask) have some interesting products that can assist users
    >with
    >real-time analysis of events that have potential security implications
    >(IDS alerts, firewall denies, login failures, etc).  But they are
    >not
    >capable of processing and storing all the logs from a large enterprise,
    
    >>
    >and retaining them for months or years in a queryable format.
    >
    >The problem of management and analysis of massive log data is a
    >distinct
    >(although similar and complementary) problem of that addressed Security
    >Event Management products.
    >
    >(Vendor Disclaimer: Addamark Technologies provides solutions in
    >the
    >former category.  Prior to joining Addamark, however, I worked for
    >3.5
    >years at a leading Security Event Management vendor.)
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 14:17, durnieat_private wrote:
    >> Call Gartner back and use the term "Security Event Management"...
    >>
    >> You'll get alot more hits, trust me...
    >>
    >> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 23:05:11 -0800 Mehtap Erdogan <Mehtap.Erdoganat_private>
    >> wrote:
    >> >Hi,
    >> >I may be considered as a newbie at  centralized logging systems,
    >>
    >> > trying to find the best for my company reading documents, getting
    >> >demos..etc.
    >> >I tried (through Gartner..etc.) but couldn't find any information
    >> >comparing different centralized logging systems.
    >> >Is it possible to get this kind of information or something similar?
    >> >Thanks, and sorry for my English..
    >> >Mehtap Erdogan,
    >> >Security Specialist Asst,
    >> >Central Bank of Turkey,
    >> >
    >> >
    >
    >_______________________________________________
    >LogAnalysis mailing list
    >LogAnalysisat_private
    >http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
    >
    >
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: Hush 2.2 (Java)
    Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify
    
    wlsEARECABsFAj6LRuIUHGR1cm5pZUBodXNobWFpbC5jb20ACgkQ3UH5NRolsbaxJQCf
    dsyGhI/Xkz8F8RR9VmZ9lYgycCcAn3u5AdY+uRrXUwF/dTasVyT4C0Gl
    =bsVj
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    _______________________________________________
    LogAnalysis mailing list
    LogAnalysisat_private
    http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 03 2003 - 12:58:47 PST