Hallo Wolfgang, > >I do some tests with logsurfer1.5b and I can not explain the result from > >Test 2. Have anyboby a good answer? > > [...] > > >Test 2: > >'kinloop ([0-9]) ([a-z]+)' - - - 0 continue > > open "kinloop $3" - 10 5 0 > > report "/bin/cat -" "kinloop $3" > > All three examples actually work as designed. In your test 2 you open > a context which matches "kinloop" followed immediatly by the name, > e.g. you try to collect lines like "kinloop paule" but NOT > "kinloop [0-9] paule". Logsurfer always adds the current line (which > openes a new context) to the context itself. That's why the first > line (e.g. "kinloop 1 paule") is in the context but no other line > (since the others don't match). > > To get your expected output you need to use this configuration: > > 'kinloop ([0-9]) ([a-z]+)' - - - 0 continue > open "kinloop [0-9] $3" - 10 5 0 > report "/bin/cat -" "kinloop [0-9] $3" It was my mistake. I didn't understand the meaning of "context" correct, but now I understand it. ;-) There are not so many howtos for logsurfer and the documentation for logsurfer is very small. > Hope this helps. Yes, thank you for your help. regards, thomas polnik _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysisat_private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 26 2003 - 08:52:34 PDT