On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:31:17AM +0100, Mikael Olsson wrote: > [1] Note to Balazs: I'm not out to slam syslog-ng. I happily use it > for local events on many boxes. I just report facts the way I see > them and think that I've written something that is better for my > specific scenario. If you think I'm wrong, I'm definitely game > for a more "official" speed comparison. I'm not really surprised that syslog-ng is not the fastest syslogd out there as it was not among the design goals. In fact I _was_ surprised that it outperforms stock sysklogd. Sysklogd is so much simpler. The solution is syslog-ng 2 where improving performance was a goal. The problem with syslog-ng 2 that it is not yet finished. :-( -- Bazsi PGP info: KeyID 9AF8D0A9 Fingerprint CD27 CFB0 802C 0944 9CFD 804E C82C 8EB1 _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysis@private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Oct 30 2003 - 08:56:06 PST