Hi Phi, 1. YES and NO (for a comprehensive security information management you should/must have both in place) People always afraid about the huge amount of logfiles - but in the most cases it is only a question of proper device configuration and correlation (it's not the amount of logs given you quality statements- only a matter of logging centralization, an intelligent correlation, categorization, priorization and last but not least: interpretation. Start with major alarms and getting familiar with the system.) Check this opensource framework: http://www.ossim.net/ (inlcudes mostly all of your requirements for a medium environment, in my opinion also for a huge distributed setup, depends on your customization effort...or you buy one of the fancy GUI SIM solutions like Arcsight, Netforensic & co) cheers, geri ________________________________ Von: loganalysis-bounces+gf=openadvice.de@private [mailto:loganalysis-bounces+gf=openadvice.de@private] Im Auftrag von Phi Phu Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. April 2005 09:38 An: loganalysis@private Betreff: [logs] About the logging infrastructure Dear all, I am a new person in this mailling list. I have some following questions that i really want they will be aswered: 1. Should we try to use effectively the existing log data (from OS and applications) for the security purpose, in stead of using IDS or other monitoring tools that also producing log data in the flooded-by-log world today? 2. (If question #1 is "yes") is there any existing solution or product that manages the log data for a small and medium enterpise (with the standard computer network including: user workstations, file server, web server, mail server, gateway to Internet, firewall, db server) for the intrusion detection purpose? 3. (if question #2 is "no") do you think that building a solution like that is possible? Thank you, and best regards, Phi _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysis@private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Wed Apr 13 2005 - 09:30:26 PDT