Message PIX-5-304001 which is a part of a "transaction" between 302013 and 302014 isnt necessarily between the two messages. Mar 29 2004 09:56:17: %PIX-5-304001: 192.168.0.2 Accessed URL 66.102.9.99 Sometimes I see a bunch of 302013's and 302014's before I see a 304001. Can I assume that it is ordered regardless? Thanks! --- Adrian Grigorof <adi@private> wrote: > Hello, > > For Pix v.6.1.x and I guess 6.2.x, each connection > is recorded by Pix with 2 > messages (referenced by the the connection number, > 360478 for the example > below): > %PIX-6-302001: Built inbound TCP connection 360478 > for faddr > 205.19.214.250/2277 gaddr 209.161.100.227/25 laddr > 192.168.0.40/25 > %PIX-6-302002: Teardown TCP connection 360478 faddr > 205.19.214.250/2277 > gaddr 209.161.100.227/25 laddr 192.168.0.40/25 > duration 0:00:01 bytes 1643 > (TCP FINs) > The "Teardown" messages contains the number of > bytes. From my expericence, > only the TCP connections have the number of bytes, > the messages related to > UDP connections do not record it (and no connection > number either): > %PIX-6-302005: Built UDP connection for faddr > 209.161.100.227/514 gaddr > 209.161.200.226/37435 laddr 192.168.0.10/1233 > %PIX-6-302006: Teardown UDP connection for faddr > 209.161.100.227/514 gaddr > 209.161.200.226/37435 laddr 192.168.0.10/1233 > > Pix v. 6.3.x record the number of bytes for the UDP > connections as well: > %PIX-6-302015: Built outbound UDP connection 33 for > outside:192.175.48.1/53 > (192.175.48.1/53) to inside:192.168.5.20/1250 > (209.161.100.236/1250) > %PIX-6-302016: Teardown UDP connection 33 for > outside:192.175.48.1/53 to > inside:192.168.5.20/1250 duration 0:00:01 bytes 153 > > BTW, you need logging level 6 in order to record > this type of information. > > Regards, > > Adrian Grigorof > www.eventid.net > www.firegen.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Walter" <walter_100@private> > To: <loganalysis@private> > Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 1:44 AM > Subject: [logs] Re: Granular Analysis of PIX syslogs > > > > Hello, > > I gleaned over PIX v6.2 messages and then looked > at > > some of the links that had some reports on > Bandwidth > > consumed by a Source IP Address. (I think it was > from > > eventid.net) Most of the PIX logs are really > > permit/deny messages without any message really > > mentioning bytes sent/recvd. I was wondering is > then > > the BW consumed calculated. Am I missing > something? > > Thanks! > > Walter > > __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysis@private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Fri May 27 2005 - 13:49:18 PDT