todd glassey wrote: > FYI I need to tell you folks about a patent I/we have filed for already. So, let me see what new interesting invention we have on our way... > what I see as a new wave of "Machine Testimony" Protocols! Woah, cool slogan ! Sound like "The Matrix" ! > my insured timestamps from CertifiedTime Inc, I see a first trouble here: your insured timestamps are worth nothing in an Italian court. Or an EU court, for that matter. Or elsewhere in the world, probably. Whatever you produce, probably is not even a document, by our standards. Sorry to break this news on you :) > To this end, I and my partner have a provisional patent already filed > for a special version of an integrated suite which features an > Authenticated reliable delivery Syslog with receipt and buffer control > acknowledgements for assured delivery or requeue service for > authenticated messages. And exactly, how do you prevent people who break into a system as root to tamper with this self-empowered evidence ? Or someone on the administrative staff to insert "evidence" ? > This system we are patenting now is built to utilize our already > patented Time and Location Cryptography and Policy Controls, A pointer to these, please ? Stefano Zanero _______________________________________________ LogAnalysis mailing list LogAnalysis@private http://lists.shmoo.com/mailman/listinfo/loganalysis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Mar 13 2006 - 22:50:30 PST