Re: small fix to sysklogd .spec file

From: beldridg@private
Date: Wed Oct 10 2001 - 10:04:08 PDT


On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Solar Designer wrote:

> Of course.  This is why I said it's the distribution which should
> provide the directory.  Red Hat Linux 7+ provides /usr/share/empty,
> but now that OpenBSD will have /var/empty I'd rather go with that.
> Hopefully other distributions (and FHS/LSB) will follow.

yeah, i read your notes in the .spec changelog. i agree.


> No.  It's just the way RPM works.  /var/empty should come from a
> package.

okay, i'll just do a --nodeps when i install.


- brett



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sun Jan 15 2006 - 13:43:15 PST