On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:42:12PM +0200, Janusz wrote: Hi, Sorry, I didn't get around to replying, and I guess most other list members (129 currently) didn't have much to suggest you as well. > just wan't to tell that finally (?) I decided to hire atftpd. > The main reason is, it is able to hold _many_ simultaneous connection > without special difficulties. That's very useful in my case (labs for > students, where all the PCs are booting almost at the same time). > > Unfortunately, I'm not able to run it controlled by supervise. > It has some trouble with --no-fork option. Why do you avoid *inetd's by so much? I personally would probably just hack the old tftpd to properly drop privileges and run it off xinetd (even though it's something I hope we'll replace eventually). -- /sd
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sun Jan 15 2006 - 13:43:16 PST