Re: /usr/include/{linux,asm}

From: Jarno Huuskonen (Jarno.Huuskonen@private)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 08:19:50 PST

Previous message: Maciek Pasternacki: "/usr/include/{linux,asm}"
In reply to: Maciek Pasternacki: "/usr/include/{linux,asm}"
Next in thread: Maciek Pasternacki: "Re: /usr/include/{linux,asm}"
Reply: Maciek Pasternacki: "Re: /usr/include/{linux,asm}"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

I'm not an expert so don't quote me on this :)

On Sat, Feb 15, Maciek Pasternacki wrote:
> Why /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm in Owl are symlinks and
> not copies of headers against which glibc was built?  Shouldn't these
> be part of glibc package, or at least be independent from whatever
> goes into /usr/src/linux?

I think RedHat 6.2 uses those same symlinks (and if you're going to
install 2.4.x kernel, then 2.4.x include files get used).

-Jarno

-- 
Jarno Huuskonen

Previous message: Maciek Pasternacki: "/usr/include/{linux,asm}"
In reply to: Maciek Pasternacki: "/usr/include/{linux,asm}"
Next in thread: Maciek Pasternacki: "Re: /usr/include/{linux,asm}"
Reply: Maciek Pasternacki: "Re: /usr/include/{linux,asm}"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sun Jan 15 2006 - 13:43:18 PST