RE: SQL Injection Legalities

From: Weaver, Woody (woody.weaverat_private)
Date: Sun Jul 21 2002 - 12:13:07 PDT

  • Next message: Michael Ray: "Re: Exchange Banner"

    I don't think that applies, as long as the machine wasn't a computer owned
    by the US government, wasn't a protected computer (accessible to the public
    is probably good cause), and there was no intent to defraud or extort.
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: darrellat_private [mailto:darrellat_private]
    Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 2:02 PM
    To: Thorat_private; PEN-TESTat_private
    Subject: RE: SQL Injection Legalities
    
    
    Check out
    
    http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/18/parts/i/chapters/47/sectio
    ns/section_1030.html
    
    I think you'll find your answer
    
    US Title 18: Part I: Chapter 47, Section 1030
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Deus, Attonbitus [mailto:Thorat_private]
    Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:48 AM
    To: Pen-Test
    Subject: SQL Injection Legalities
    
    
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    
    I hesitate asking the group about law, but here goes:
    
    Lets say a site gives you the capability to search their product-base via a 
    web input box.  You know, the standard search/submit deal.
    
    You type in "bicycle" and it gives you everything that starts with 
    "bicycle."  Simple enough.  As we all know, web app susceptibility to SQL 
    injects runs amok; lets say in this case that instead of typing "bicycle," 
    I type "bicycle' or 1=1--" and get all the products.  Have I broken the 
    law?  More specifically, have I broken the law in the US?
    
    One could argue that the site is allowing me to specify what I want to see, 
    and all I am doing is typing in what I want...  Though the developer may 
    not have intended for me to pull up the data like that, does my doing so 
    constitute a crime?
    
    I'm not looking for ethical or moral debate here, I am hoping someone has 
    some distinct legal experience who knows.  Thanks.
    
    AD
    
    
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGP 7.1
    
    iQA/AwUBPTWfwYhsmyD15h5gEQLKuACgioeYyenUFEbI6HXpYbo5AjL920cAoNJv
    ANJ4aOg8vjqGS5JSZK2V5Hyt
    =nm/7
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
    Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
    automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
    https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
    Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
    automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
    https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
    Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
    automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
    https://alerts.securityfocus.com/
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 22 2002 - 07:23:06 PDT