Re: Vulnerability scanners

From: Alex Russell (alexat_private)
Date: Thu Mar 27 2003 - 13:51:45 PST

  • Next message: Nicolas Gregoire: "Re: Vulnerability scanners"

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    On Thursday 27 March 2003 12:58 pm, Jeff Williams @ Aspect wrote:
    > Let's assume that you're talking about 256 IPs (based on Qualys'
    > published pricing), and you want to scan weekly.  That's at least a day a
    > week of effort for someone (probably more to generate a very nice report
    > and summaries).  The cost of a full-time sysadmin (including salary,
    > benefits, office, etc...) probably costs well north of $100K.  You'd have
    > to include some equipment costs in there.  So I doubt you could do it
    > much cheaper. I think vulnerability scanning is a reasonable thing to
    > outsource for companies that are not in the security or networking field
    > already.
    
    This sounds like a false economy to me.
    
    First: how does the Qualis box remove the need for a sysadmin? It's just one 
    more appliance to manage, and something your existing admin should be able 
    to do anyway. And if you already didn't have an admin, you'd need one now 
    that you're thinking in terms of security. No extra cost here (aside from 
    incremental admin time).
    
    Secondly: if you've got a trained monkey doing your report generation, then 
    you're right about the costs. If, however, you have a developer automate 
    most of that, then you can add more nodes to be scanned at much lower 
    incremental cost (change a config file). Additionally, using public 
    signature sets may have downsides, but using Open Source tools is good both 
    for your own internal flexiblity and for the world at large (checks aren't 
    quite right? set that developer to work writing and contributing back 
    better ones!).
    
    All in all, your initial costs to do it in house with smart people and Open 
    Source tools might be higher, but your incremental costs do not grow at 
    nearly the same rate. OTOH, if you don't have any admins or developers, 
    then Qualys might look like a very nice option.
    
    HTH
    
    - -- 
    Alex Russell
    alexat_private
    alexat_private
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
    
    iD8DBQE+g3J/oV0dQ6uSmkYRAvN6AJ44Qwzu3sSypJkLDRbl1W1ZjrrnswCZASf0
    m88qoVsnBJR2vt7vXZaYyKc=
    =kMak
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    
    
    top spam and e-mail risk at the gateway.
    SurfControl E-mail Filter puts the brakes on spam & viruses
    and gives you the reports to prove it. See exactly how much
    junk never even makes it in the door. Free 30-day trial:
    http://www.surfcontrol.com/go/zsfptl1
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 27 2003 - 14:15:03 PST