Re: Product review postings (was Administrivia)

From: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (gwenat_private)
Date: Tue Jul 08 2003 - 12:43:51 PDT

  • Next message: Alfred Huger: "Re: Product review postings (was Administrivia)"

    On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Alfred Huger wrote:
    > You would? You would expect me to censor obviously damaging material to
    > the vendor? I think I must have missed something in your earlier thread.
    > You think its OK for me to censor anything damaging to the vendor but not
    > OK for me to expect people to be held accountable for their musings I do
    > decide are OK? I am not going to re-iterate my previous concerns because I
    > am not sure I am articulating them well enough for you to understand.
    
    I expect that you'd drop a posting from -any- entity that had abusive
    or blatantly off content.
    
    > Suffice it to say this exercise is not about protecting vendors from
    > negative opinions.
    
    -That- has yet to be proven. It certainly isn't at all aparent  from
    what you've written to date that protection of vendors isn't one
    of your primary goals.
    
    > >>Beyond that, if a vendor is sufficiently concerned about a given
    > >>posting, I'd suggest that they respond (as regularly happens) to
    > >>he posting with calm, factual information.
    >
    > Again, youre missing the point here. I am at a loss as to how to explain
    > the issues at hand here in a more clear concise way for you.
    
    Please try. I'm really quite curious to understand what you believe
    that you're trying to acomplish.
    
    > >>Let me point you to:
    > >>http://www.chillingeffects.org/johndoe/
    >
    > Great but it does not answer my question, care to try? Both of the URLs
    > you provided speak to these issues in both generic and specific instances
    > but none citing this industry in regards to Product Reviews  the issue in
    > question here. Also keep in mind this in legal terms is hardly an issue
    > specific to the USA. In fact this list and its moderators are not in the
    > USA. Symantec SF is also not a US based company.
    
    I'm a bit boggled that you can look at both general and specific
    instances in the software industry, but not specifically the security
    industry, and somehow believe that "That can't happen here".
    
    At any rate, I'm well aware that the list and its moderators are not
    in the US.  Calgary, if I recall correctly. Obviously you need no
    reminding that not all subscribers are in the US, either[0].
    
    > >>...and I'd ask again, "accountable"? Does that mean 'has an established
    > >>dentity online'
    > Thats a good start actually.
    
    How does that treat people like Rain Forest Puppy and Mudge, whose online
    identies are clearly not real names?
    
    > Yes and dont forget a blood sample. Youre expanding this into an argument
    > for privacy and anonymity in the greater sense whereas this is a
    > discussion around one item for a small community (this list). I suspect
    > you have strong feelings about the greater issues here and I applaud you
    > for it but this is simply not the right argument for you to bring them to
    > bear.
    
    I'm asking you to formally state the criteria you intend to use to
    determine whether somebody is posting from an appropriate "accountable"
    address.
    
    > Great, Ive gone from a list moderator to a servant of the faceless
    > Government Concern bent on spinning policy for the subjugated masses. I
    > have to wonder if thats a  promotion. Perhaps you can start throwing
    > around terms like ZOG in your next message so we can really bring out the
    > conspiracy theories.
    
    If you like, I can claim that you're actually Theo de Raadt, since
    everybody knows that there are only ten people in Canada... [0]
    
    cheers!
    
    [0]Registrant:
     Reptilian Research
     1175-1930 Yonge Street
     Toronto, ON M4S 1Z4
     CA
    
     Domain name: REPTILES.ORG
    ==========================================================================
    "A cat spends her life conflicted between a deep, passionate and profound
    desire for fish and an equally deep, passionate and profound desire to
    avoid getting wet.  This is the defining metaphor of my life right now."
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The Lightning Console aggregates IDS events, correlates them with 
    vulnerability info, reduces false positives with the click of a button, anddistributes this information to hundreds of users.
    
    Visit Tenable Network Security at http://www.tenablesecurity.com to learn 
    more.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 08 2003 - 14:14:27 PDT