RE: Product review postings (was Administrivia)

From: clarke-cummingsat_private
Date: Tue Jul 08 2003 - 12:51:54 PDT

  • Next message: Mark C. Langston: "Re: Product review postings (was Administrivia)"

    I don't think it is unreasonable expectation that people identify
    themselves when criticizing a product/vendor.  I also think that vendor's
    should be required to go one step farther and identify themselves as
    _working for_ or _affiliated with_ said vendor.  Everyone seems to be
    assuming that people wrongly criticizing a product can do damage, but what
    about false or overly positive posts about products?  
    
    But I also think we are thinking way to hard about this.  At this time I am
    willing, based on past experience, to trust Al to do a good job moderating
    product/vendor postings.  
    
    Newspeak=Ari Fleischer
    
    Cheers,
    Clarke
    
    Original Message:
    -----------------
    From: David J. Meltzer djmat_private
    Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 15:16:24 -0400
    To: pen-testat_private
    Subject: RE: Product review postings (was Administrivia)
    
    
    I have in the past (years pre-securityfocus) been personally attacked
    with lies about products I've been involved in by anonymous authors, and
    I, like Al, have seen that anonymous cowards can make a real impact if
    given the audience.  That audience will always exist on full-disclosure
    and other unmoderated lists, but I don't think there is any reason SF
    needs to give them a forum. 
    
    Fact is, the posts that are most harmful don't come across as "y0ur
    pr0dukt sukz", they are carefully written by intelligent folks who
    insert their lies into coherent sentences.  Even with an equally
    intelligent statement refuting it by the vendor, there is no real way
    for a 3rd party observer to know who is telling the truth.  
    
    I hope SF will go further in building more accountable and secure means
    for folks in the security industry to be able to communicate with each
    other over time, but drawing a line in the sand at this absurdity is a
    good first step.
    
    -Dave
    
    -------------------
    David J. Meltzer
    djmat_private   
    CTO, Intrusec, Inc.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The Lightning Console aggregates IDS events, correlates them with 
    vulnerability info, reduces false positives with the click of a button,
    anddistributes this information to hundreds of users.
    
    Visit Tenable Network Security at http://www.tenablesecurity.com to learn 
    more.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    mail2web - Check your email from the web at
    http://mail2web.com/ .
    
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The Lightning Console aggregates IDS events, correlates them with 
    vulnerability info, reduces false positives with the click of a button, anddistributes this information to hundreds of users.
    
    Visit Tenable Network Security at http://www.tenablesecurity.com to learn 
    more.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 08 2003 - 14:42:00 PDT