Re: bind_allows_update.nasl (shall I commit this one ?)

From: H D Moore (hdmat_private)
Date: Sun Mar 02 2003 - 21:24:05 PST

Next message: Michael Scheidell: "Major remote root vunerability found in sendmail"

Previous message: sulloat_private: "Re: bind_allows_update.nasl (shall I commit this one ?)"
In reply to: sulloat_private: "Re: bind_allows_update.nasl (shall I commit this one ?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Anyone aware of any DNS services that allow update requests by default? I 
believe some Win2K configurations allow this... something to do with 
wins/dhcp to track hostnames or something.

On Sunday 02 March 2003 07:59 pm, sulloat_private wrote:
> Quoting Renaud Deraison <deraisonat_private>:
> > shall I commit this plugin ?
>
> Absolutely.  I would very much like to know about a misconfiguration
> like this...
>
> -Sullo

Next message: Michael Scheidell: "Major remote root vunerability found in sendmail"
Previous message: sulloat_private: "Re: bind_allows_update.nasl (shall I commit this one ?)"
In reply to: sulloat_private: "Re: bind_allows_update.nasl (shall I commit this one ?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Mar 02 2003 - 21:24:29 PST