Michael Scheidell wrote: > , this nasl is going to get patched several times, and while we > are doing that, I hope that we can add this verbage to it (attached) > > It explains that if you patch sendmail, or run this nasl against a patched > sendmail, you will get a false positive. Shouldn't we also link to the CERT advisory or the CERT's VU? It gives a detailed list of which vendors are vulnerable: http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2003-07.html http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/398025 Maybe we also need a script_vu_id()? Regards Javi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 06 2003 - 01:59:26 PST