On Dec 19, 2004, at 5:53 AM, Renaud Deraison wrote:
> Ideally, I'd rather have an 'extra' field to security_XXX().
>
> ie:
> security_note(port:port, extra:"The remote host is running " + ver);
That would be great! To concur with Michael Scheidell, it would be
even better if there was some way to specify where the dynamic text
would get plumbed in. However, if that is not worth the complication,
then I'd be very satisfied with how you've described the interface.
Regarding the plugin(s) that I currently have issue with, should I
submit a patch using George's method until the security_xxx() methods
support this interface?
Best regards,
Erik Stephens www.edgeos.com
Managed Vulnerability Assessment Services
_______________________________________________
Plugins-writers mailing list
Plugins-writers@private
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/plugins-writers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sun Dec 19 2004 - 14:40:45 PST