Thanks for the inital response. I want to keep the dialog open because of two reasons. 1st, I was suprised to see no information on this topic when I first started searching with Google. Hopefully we will help others out too. 2nd, validating screen saver settings a real security problem. In our environment and I am sure others there are workstations and kiosks that need not only network security settings monitored but physical security settings to. >> -----Original Message----- > One possible problem: > It might not show anything if there is no current user logged on anyway. > Haven't used it, but if you look at regedit, you see CURRENTUSER, but > you see any other users not currently logged on as separate SIDS's > there. > > Not sure if plugin will return one answer for each possible user, or > just the current logged on user. > > If target system is 2002+ with AD, you might find these in domain > security policies (which would enforce them anyway, with ability to > prevent luser from disabling it) > > Might be able to use BOUND LDAP queries on AD to find this information. Thanks for the work around suggestions and potential fixes but I had considered these before I started. They are not options because some of the devices are not part of an AD domain. The fun of working in my environment. I am aware that it if the plugin is working that it may not show any information for HKEY_CURRENT_USER if no one was logged in. That makes sense and I assume if no one is logged in then the screen saver time out is not an issue since the device would require authentication anyways. Its a good thought but its not the problem. I can tell using Ethereal that the reqistry query is failing. It took me a while to understand why Ethereal was decoding the return packet as: WINREG OpenKey respons, Error: File no found (pathname error). Here is a portion of my code: hcu = RegConnectRegistry(hkey:HKEY_CURRENT_USER); if ( isnull(hcu) ) { NetUseDel(); exit(0); } key = "Control Panel\Desktop"; keyh = RegOpenKey(handle:hcu, key:key, mode:MAXIMUM_ALLOWED); The confusing part is that RegConnectRegistry(hkey:HKEY_CURRENT_USER) works. In Ethereal you seen the connection to HKEY_CURRENT_USER as successful. What was confusing was that RegOpenKey(handle:hcu, key:key, mode:MAXIMUM_ALLOWED) was failing. I believe this is because it never really attached to HKEY_CURRENT_USER. Instead it was looking at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE. This is the reason that I started looking at registry_open_hkcu() as an alternative and my prior post was looking for more information on how to use it. >> -----Original Message----- >> It would be a huge help if anyone knows the complete syntax to use the >> registry_open_hkcu() function, knows of a plugin that already >> uses it, or has >> examples that I can work from. > > grep is your friend: > > grep registry_open_hkc *.inc > smb_nt.inc:function registry_open_hkcr(soc, uid, tid, pipe) > > find ./ -name '*.nasl' -exec grep -H registry_open_hkcu {} \; > > (seems it exists in smb_nt.inc but not in any current plugins) You really threw me for a loop on this one but make an excellent point. You greped for hkc and not hkcu. This returned only hkcr which I believe is HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT. I verified it in my installation too. So now the big question is: Does this mean that registry_open_hkcu() does not exist at all? _______________________________________________ Plugins-writers mailing list Plugins-writers@private http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/plugins-writers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sun Feb 26 2006 - 07:45:33 PST