On Mar 27, 2006, at 11:09 AM, PaJohnston@private wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the quick response. Actually, I was using administrator > credentials. I wonder if something else has gone wrong during the > scan? Possibly. It would be interesting to get a pcap trace next time, to see wether it did access C$ or not. > When you say Nessus does understand patches being superceded, is > this only when doing file version checks? Both. However when doing file version checks, we don't have to go thru the older bulletins (version N + 1 is always newer than version N), while we have to when doing registry-based checks, and because superceeding patches is transitive (if N supercedes M and M supercedes O, then N supercedes O) this caused the problem you saw. It's now fixed in CVS. Thanks, -- Renaud _______________________________________________ Plugins-writers mailing list Plugins-writers@private http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/plugins-writers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Mar 27 2006 - 08:16:40 PST