FC: Canning spam through contracts instead of federal regulations

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Apr 19 2001 - 13:12:40 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Humorless FBI agents interrogate publisher of Columbine satire"

    ********
    
    From: Sonia Arrison <sarrisonat_private>
    To: "'declanat_private'" <declanat_private>
    Subject: Canning spam through contracts
    Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 12:14:49 -0700
    
    Fyi - from Siliconvalley.com.  This shows that the market is working.  A
    contract was broken, and the company was forced to pay.  It's a small 
    violation, so it's a small award.  But the principle that a privacy 
    contract must be honored was upheld in the consumer's favor.
    
    -Sonia
    
    Opt-out user mercilessly encouraged to opt in: A number of
      you wrote in Wednesday to comment on Slashdot's discussion
      of what appears to be the first successful application of
      California's anti-spam laws. The plaintiff in the case,
      Ellen Spertus, filed suit against Kozmo.com in California
      small claims court after receiving an e-mail that
      Kozmo.com broadcast specifically to those who had opted
      OUT of receiving such announcements. Ironically, the text
      of the offending e-mail encouraged those who received it
      to visit the Kozmo.com site and opt-in to its subscriber
      contact list. An asinine marketing effort to be sure, and
      one with which Spertus took issue in a number of
      complaints sent to the venture. In a formal response her
      messages, a Kozmo.com representative -- while explaining
      that the e-mail in question was "in no way intended to be
      obnoxious" -- took great pains to confirm that the
      now-defunct company had "knowingly sent out to all
      customers who elected not to opt in during sign-up."
      Little did he know that his conciliatory message would be
      a key document in Spertus' suit against the company, which
      was resolved in her favor Wednesday. Spertus, who was
      awarded $50 in damages and $27.50 in court costs,
      aparently declined to accept Kozmo.com's offer of "ten
      Kozmo dollars" for her troubles.
        http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/04/18/1251219&mode=thread
        http://www.suespammers.org/ca/lawindex.shtml
        http://www.spertus.com/ellen/Kozmo/kozmo1.html
        http://www.spertus.com/ellen/Kozmo/kozmo2.html
        http://www.spertus.com/ellen/Kozmo/judgment.gif
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact.
    To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 19 2001 - 12:26:50 PDT