FC: Ralph Nader demands more privacy regulations: Opt-out not enough

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Jun 28 2001 - 07:45:08 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: SiliconValley.com hosts roundtable on free software, shared source"

    ---
    
    To: declanat_private
    Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:15:06 -0400
    From: Bruce Chesley <excalibur25at_private>
    
          FYI.
    Bruce Chesley
    Truth is a terrible cross to bear.
    Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered.".  Thomas Paine
    Treason for $$$:  ALL "pro 2A" orgs.
    --------- Begin forwarded message ----------
    
    Source:  PrivacyRightsNow!
    http://www.privacyrightsnow.com/
    
    Opt-Out for Your Privacy
    
    By Ralph Nader
    June 21, 2001
    
          The Fourth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution spells out the
    right of citizens to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers
    and effects against unreasonable searches..." by their government.
          When that amendment was ratified in 1791, no one imagined that
    it would be corporations, not governments, which would use their
    vast power to invade the privacy of citizens and, in effect, carry
    out unreasonable searches of the most intimate personal data.
          But, that is exactly what is happening, particularly among newly
    formed giant financial conglomerates which have access to a mass
    of data collected about millions of individuals by their far-flung
    insurance, bank, credit card and securities affiliates.
          Today, these giant corporations can assemble information to
    build a head to toe profile of most citizens and their buying and
    personal habits including what prescription and non-prescription
    health products they use as well as their investments, income,
    employment histories and entertainment preferences.
          For this, consumers can thank the Clinton Administration and a
    bi-partisan group of Senators and Congressmen who lacked the
    courage to really defend citizens' right to privacy when the so called
    Financial Modernization legislation moved through the Congress in 1999.
    This law is the vehicle which allows banks, securities firms and
    insurance companies to merge as parts of financial conglomerates.
          People like Democratic Representative Ed Markey of Massachusetts
    and Republican Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama fought hard to give
    citizens the right to control where and when their personal information
    was sold or used in any manner not authorized in writing in advance by
    you, the consumer-owner of the information.
          In short, under the Markey-Shelby approach consumers would have
    to "opt-in" in writing specifically authorizing the use of the
    information.
    Without this written affirmative permission from the consumer, the
    corporations could not sell, share or use the data for any purpose
    beyond that specifically agreed to by the consumer.
          The industry, however, believed (correctly) that few consumers
    would give permission to have their information shared with unknown
    persons and corporations.  They lobbied, successfully, for an opt-out
    system which would require consumers to send in a form indicating
    that they were opposed.  The burden was on the consumer to "opt out."
    If they forgot the form or failed to send it in or could not understand
    the
    legal jargon, the company would be free to distribute the personal
    information anywhere or to anyone it chose.
          The industry lobbyists threatened to walk away from the legislation
    if the Shelby-Markey opt-in was adopted.  The Clinton Administration
    and a bi-partisan majority in the Congress surrendered to the threats
    and left privacy protections to the financial industry's demand for a
    weak ineffectual opt-out approach.
          The industry has sent out more than a billion of the opt-out notices
    
    as required by law.  Most of them have been stuffed in the envelopes
    with a variety of miscellaneous promotional brochures accompanying
    monthly billing statements.
          Financial consultants who are following the issue estimate that
    only about five percent of the opt-out notices are being returned --
    the remainder tossed in the trash unnoticed and unread.
          Further rendering the opt-out approach nearly useless is the fact
    that many of the notices are written clumsily with little attempt to
    explain the consumers' rights in clear understandable language.
    Some appear to have been copied verbatim from technical federal
    regulations without translation into language that would help
    consumers take proper action to protect their privacy.
          "People don't read them, and they don't understand them," Karen
    Petrou, a leading financial consultant told a banking conference in
    Washington recently.  That was exactly what the financial lobbyists
    were betting on when they pushed the opt-out language on a willing
    Congress.
          Despite the shortcomings of the opt-out approach, consumer
    organizations and the media should do everything possible to
    publicize the existence of the opt-out possibilities and to encourage
    consumers to protect their privacy by sending in the opt-out forms
    immediately.
          But the only truly effective means of controlling the wholesale
    invasion of privacy is for Congress to flatly prohibit the distribution
    of personal information unless the consumer has specifically
    authorized it in writing in advance.
          Your personal information belongs to you.  You do not authorize
    its wholesale distribution just because you have provided information
    to a bank for a specific limited purpose such as a home mortgage.
    The bank should not have the right to sell or share that information for
    any other purpose unless you authorize it in writing and know
    specifically what information is being released and to whom.
          Your personal information is your personal property.
          You should demand that the financial institutions you deal with so
    treat it.  And you should demand to know how your Congressman
    voted when the Financial Modernization Act was adopted in November,
    1999 with a weak industry-supported opt-out provision attached.
    
    For Further Information on Privacy Contact: U. S. PIRG, 218 D Street, SE
    Washington, D. C. 20003
    --------- End forwarded message ----------
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jun 28 2001 - 08:37:35 PDT