FC: NRC asks for reviewers for forthcoming Internet porn report

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Tue Aug 14 2001 - 07:37:21 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: U.S. business groups back Yahoo in tussle with French court"

    Background from Politech archives:
    
    "Net-sex NRC panel asks for testimony, will hold regional mtgs"
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-01852.html
    
    "Patricia Nell Warren's comments to NAS porn panel"
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-01615.html
    
    "National Academy of Sciences panel hears about porn & kids"
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-01571.html
    
    "Free speech advocates fret about NAS Net-porn commission"
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-01567.html
    
    ********
    
    From: "Herb Lin" <HLinat_private>
    Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 06:03:30 -0400
    Subject: 8-CALL FOR REVIEWERS: Draft NRC report on "Tools and Strategies
    	for Protecting Kids from Pornography and Their Applicability to
    	Other Inappropriate Internet Content."
    
    
    CALL FOR REVIEWERS - PLEASE POST WIDELY
    
    The National Research Council seeks reviewers for a draft report on its project
    on "Tools and Strategies for Protecting Kids from Pornography and Their
    Applicability to Other Inappropriate Internet Content."   More information on
    this project, including a list of committee members, can be found at <
    http://www.itasnrc.org>.
    
    Purpose of review
    
    Every report of the National Research Council must be reviewed by a diverse
    group of experts other than its authors before it may be released outside the
    institution.  This independent, rigorous review is a hallmark that 
    distinguishes
    the NRC from many other organizations offering scientific and technical advice
    on issues of national importance.  The purpose of such review is to assist the
    authors in making their report as accurate and effective as possible, and to
    enhance the clarity, cogency, and credibility of the final document.
    
    Responsibilities of reviewers
    
    Reviewers are asked to consider whether in their judgment the evidence and
    arguments presented are sound and the report is fully responsive to the study
    charge, not whether they concur with the findings.  Reviewers provide written
    comments on any and all aspects of the draft report, and the authoring 
    committee
    is expected to consider all review comments and to provide written responses to
    those comments, either modifying the report accordingly or explaining why the
    report was not modified.  The committee's responses are themselves evaluated by
    the National Research Council for adequacy and completeness.  Note that NRC
    reports have a history of changing significantly between draft and final
    versions as the result of reviewer comments.
    
    Qualifications of reviewers
    
    Reviewers of NRC reports are selected on the basis of personal expertise in a
    field or fields relevant to the subject matter of the report; a dedication to
    drawing conclusions based on the analysis of data and information; sufficiently
    seniority in their fields to warrant broad respect for their intellect,
    fairness, and stature.  Names of reviewers are made public at the time of the
    report's final publication, but during the review process they are anonymous to
    the committee and staff.
    
    Confidentiality of report
    
    Because NRC reports change as the result of review, reviewers must be 
    willing to
    keep the draft report absolutely confidential and otherwise abide by the NRC's
    guidelines for reviewing of reports.
    
    Procedure for submitting names
    
    Please forward nominations for reviewers (self-nominations acceptable) to
    itasat_private  The "subject" line of the e-mail should say "reviewer
    nomination."  Submitted nominations should include contact information,
    biographies (including relevant published works, public statements, and current
    or former positions of relevance), and indications of relevant expertise 
    and the
    perspective on the subject that the nominee will bring.  Note that while 
    the NRC
    seeks nominations from a wide variety of sources, it reserves the exclusive
    right to determine reviewers of its reports.
    
    Deadline for Nominations
    
    While nominations may be submitted at any time, nominations without the
    information described above, or received after September 15, 2001, may not be
    fully considered.
    
    
    More information is available from the Web site of this project at <
    http://www.itasnrc.org> or from
    Herb Lin (Study Director), at 202-334-2605.
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Aug 14 2001 - 07:48:04 PDT