FC: ICANN domain name dispute process appears biased, by M.Geist

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 07:10:51 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Letter from DOJ to good samaritan who noted web security hole"

    ********
    
    Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:20:17 -0400
    To: declanat_private
    From: Michael Geist <mgeistat_private>
    Subject: ICANN UDRP Study Raises Panelist Allocation Bias Concerns
    
    Declan,
    
    I have just completed a study on the ICANN UDRP that may be of interest to 
    you and your readers.  Study is at
    http://aix1.uottawa.ca/~geist/geistudrp.pdf
    
    It reviewed all 3094 ICANN UDRP decisions (through July 7, 2001) and found 
    that when providers control who decides a case (which they do for all 
    single panel cases), complainants win just over 83 percent of the 
    time.  When provider influence over panelists diminishes, which occurs in 
    three-member panel cases, the complainant winning percentage drops to 60 
    percent.  In addition to the dramatic difference in outcome between single 
    and three-member panels, the study finds that case allocation appears to be 
    heavily biased toward ensuring that a majority of cases are steered toward 
    complainant-friendly panelists. As of July 7, 2001, an astonishing 53% of 
    all NAF single panel cases (512 of 966) were decided by only six 
    people.  The complainant winning percentage in those cases was an 
    astounding 94%.  WIPO, meanwhile, has failed to assign even one of its 1629 
    single panel cases to at least two panelists perceived to be 
    pro-respondent.  Of the 104 WIPO panelists to have decided five or more 
    cases, all but one have complainants winning at least 50% of the time.
    
    In conjunction with the release of the study, I have ported much of the 
    collected data to the Web.  Udrpinfo.com features a searchable database of 
    the track record of individual panel members with more features to 
    come.  Beta version of the site is at http://www.udrpinfo.com.
    
    Media coverage this morning includes
    
    Do Cyberspace Court Panels Favor Trademark Holders? (sub required)
    http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB998251965684550590.htm
    
    Web Arbitration Biased: Study
    <http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/GIS.Servlets.HTMLTemplate?tf=tgam/common/FullStory.html&cf=tgam/common/FullStory.cfg&configFileLoc=tgam/config&vg=BigAdVariableGenerator&date=20010820&dateOffset=&hub=headdex&title=Headlines&cache_key=headdexBusiness¤t_row=15&start_row=15&num_rows=1>
    
    Regards,
    
    MG
    -- 
    **********************************************************************
    Professor Michael A. Geist
    University of Ottawa Law School, Common Law Section
    57 Louis Pasteur St., P.O. Box 450, Stn. A, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5
    Tel: 613-562-5800, x3319     Fax: 613-562-5124
    e-mail:	mgeistat_private
    URL:	http://www.lawbytes.com
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Aug 20 2001 - 07:17:49 PDT