FC: Microsoft allies reply to dead-people-writing-letters story

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Sat Aug 25 2001 - 21:02:16 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: More on Brian K. West, DOJ, and "Good Samaritan" prosecution"

    Previous Politech article:
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-02425.html
    
    FYI, Citizens Against Government Waste and Citizens for a Sound Economy are 
    groups that have been around since the 1980s and are Republican/free-market 
    leaning. They receive money from Microsoft.
    
    -Declan
    
    **********
    
    Subject: Microsoft letter.
    Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:44:25 -0400
    From: srushtonat_private
    
    CITIZENS AGAINST GOVERNMENT WASTE
    1301 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 400
    Washington, DC 20036
    202-467-5300
    
       CAGW Criticizes LA Times Story
    
    Washington, D.C. - Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) today released
    the following letter to the Los Angeles Times.
    
    					August 23, 2001
    
    The Editor
    The Los Angeles Times
    Times Mirror Square
    Los Angeles, CA 90053
    
    Dear Editor,
    
    Concerning the allegations made in your August 23rd article, "Lobbyists Tied
    to Microsoft Wrote Citizens' Letters," about Citizens Against Government
    Waste (CAGW):
    
    CAGW's involvement in technology issues dates to its inception with
    President Reagan's 1984 Grace Commission, which made dozens of
    recommendations on government waste and technology issues.  Following that
    tradition, CAGW has, since the beginning, viewed the government's case
    against Microsoft with skepticism.  We strongly believe consumer interests
    are better served by market competition than bureaucratic regulation and
    lawsuits in all but the rarest of cases.  So far, the government has spent
    more than $30 million on litigation, with endless months of further legal
    wrangling ahead.   The states' attorneys general, anxious for headlines and
    pay dirt, have spent more than $13 million on the case and are aggressively
    pushing forward.
    
    Your article relies more on innuendo than evidence and accurate accounting
    of facts.  First, CAGW and Americans For Technology Leadership (ATL) are
    separate entities and have conducted independent campaigns regarding
    Microsoft.  The article does not make this distinction and does not specify
    which quotes are attributable to which organization.  CAGW's criticism has
    always been based on wasteful use of government resources and is consistent
    with our core mission.
    
    Further, CAGW activates its more-than one million members and supporters
    nationwide with regular mailings on a wide variety of issues, of which
    Microsoft is one.  Check our website (www.cagw.org) to find letters on waste
    matters such as military base closures, prescription drug benefits, and
    dairy subsidies.  We encourage citizens to forward these letters by e-mail
    to their representatives in government if they wish.  Another technique is
    to send supporters hardcopy letters for them to sign and forward, again, if
    they wish.
    
    Contrary to the article's implication, there is nothing insidious or unusual
    about such practice.  Next time, instead of consulting the ivory tower, ask
    a direct mail expert or political activist.  You will find this type of
    grassroots campaign is not only standard in politics but quintessentially
    American - organizing public participation in the political process as an
    expression of freedom of speech.  And for what it's worth, the Microsoft
    issue receives a particularly good response from CAGW's supporters.  These
    letters reflect real concerns that thousands of our members have with the
    government's action in the Microsoft case.  In fact, national surveys reveal
    that two-thirds of Americans believe the case has been a waste of tax
    dollars.
    
    CAGW takes exception to the insinuation that the grassroot sentiment on the
    Microsoft issue was somehow fabricated.  Had the authors called our office
    for clarification, they would have heard that CAGW mailed 81,000 letters to
    our supporters in the 19 states persevering in the Microsoft case.  Despite
    their dismissals, the outcry from so many constituents clearly rattled the
    state attorneys general.  If they choose to ignore their constituents'
    views, they do so at their own peril.
    
    					Sincerely,
    
    					THOMAS A. SCHATZ
    					President
    
       --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------------
       Sean Rushton, Media Director
       Citizens Against Government Waste
       1301 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 400,
       Washington DC  20036-1838
       Phone:  202-467-5300	Fax:  202-467-4253
       http://www.cagw.org
    
    **********
    
    From: "Erick R. Gustafson" <egustafsonat_private>
    To: "'declanat_private'" <declanat_private>
    Subject: RE: Dead people write pro-Microsoft letters to governors; ATL poll
    Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:40:17 -0400
    
    Declan:
    
    I'm more than a little concerned that this news media coverage
    mis-characterizes the grassroots activism surrounding the antitrust issue.
    CSE's activists care passionately about the issue and (bonus) they aren't
    dead.  We feel that CSE's members are unimpeachable.  Take a look at the
    attached document that covers a small portion of the grassroots work in
    North Carolina.
    
    Erick
    
    [MSWD document converted. --DBM]
    
    June 6, 2001    A     www.cse.org    A     888-Join-CSE
    
    NC CSE Staff and Activists Meet with Attorney General Roy Cooper
    Restate Their Opposition to the State's Antitrust Lawsuit Against Microsoft
    
    
    Raleigh, NC - North Carolina Citizens for a Sound Economy (NC CSE) held its 
    second annual North Carolina CSE Day at the Capitol in Raleigh on June 
    5.  An eye-popping 475 dedicated NC CSE grassroots activists flooded the 
    capitol to lobby their legislators on a number of core CSE issues.  As the 
    activists made their way through the halls of the capitol, a select few of 
    NC CSE's super-activists and CSE staff visited with Attorney General Roy 
    Cooper to discuss their concerns with the state's antitrust lawsuit against 
    Microsoft Corporation.
    
    NC CSE Activists and Staff - Leading the charge into the AG's office were 
    CSE's Super-Activist of the Year, Joyce Fernando, Joyce Krawiec, Jack and 
    Mary Joe Gibson, Lib Rhodes, Margret Bumgarner, Judge Manning, Peter Hans, 
    and Valarie Rechtin.  CSE staff including CSE President, Paul Beckner, 
    Communications and Technology director, Kent Lassman and Vice President for 
    Public Affairs, Charles Fuller, accompanied the activists.
    
    During the 20 minute meeting with the Attorney General and his staff, the 
    group expressed their concerns with government-sponsored lawsuit abuse and 
    once again asked Cooper to drop the state from the U.S. Department of 
    Justice's antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft Corp.  The activists 
    reiterated that no consumer harm had occurred and that NC's economy has 
    benefited greatly from the software maker.
    
    Media - The event was covered by numerous print, radio and television media 
    outlets including NC National Public Radio, the Raleigh News and Observer, 
    Durham-Chapel Hill's Herald Sun, and Raleigh-Durham's WRAL-TV.  Coverage of 
    NC CSE Day at the Capitol can be found at 
    http://www.herald-sun.com/state/6-112347.html, 
    http://www.newsobserver.com/tuesday/front/Story/503541p-502342c.html and 
    http://www.wral.com/home/806240/index.html.
    
    **********
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 25 2001 - 21:08:42 PDT