FC: Jim Bell update: Partial transcript online, Sierra Times report

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Aug 30 2001 - 20:43:21 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Roger Clarke and EFA: Australia must ditch 253-page "Privacy Act""

    Excerpt from a Sierra Times report written by their correspondent, who was 
    present at Bell's sentencing last Friday:
    
    http://www.sierratimes.com/archive/files/aug/26/arex082601.htm
        After a flurry of motions to dismiss the case for reasons varying from
        judicial prejudice to fraud by the court were denied, Bell's attorney
        Robert Leen addressed the pre-sentencing report. A normal practice in
        federal trials and many state criminal trials, the pre-sentencing
        report recommends a sentence depending on a number of factors. A
        defendant is assigned a "level" based on the crime and this level is
        adjusted upward if other factors are present. Leen argued that the
        factors that were applied were inappropriate or not present.
    
        Two of the factors might be of specific interest to Sierra Times
        readers. Using internet search engines to find the addresses of
        federal agents was considered a "special skill" which the majority of
        people don't reasonably possess. Although Leen pointed out that even
        his five-year-old could access a search engine and this was hardly
        demonstrative of a special skill, this argument was lost on the judge
        who had previously demonstrated an almost total lack of knowledge in
        the area during the trial.
    
        The other factor was that Bell showed no remorse over
        authoring Assassination Politics. Several times both the prosecutor
        and judge mentioned, in a style redolent of Soviet courts, that Bell
        hadn't" recanted" his essay, and therefore needed to be imprisoned
        "for the safety of the public."
    
    The Assistant U.S. Attorney, Robb London, repeatedly stressed during the 
    trial that Bell had not retracted or recanted his "Assassination Politics" 
    essay (Bell characterized this as a thoughtcrime prosecution).
    
    See:
    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,42860,00.html
    >"It's still on the Internet today," London said during the second day of 
    >the trial in federal district court. "He has not retracted it."
    
    John Young has posted the first two days of Bell's tesimony:
    http://cryptome.org/jdb040601.htm
    http://cryptome.org/jdb040901-2.htm
    
    Background on U.S. v. Jim Bell:
    http://www.cluebot.com/search.pl?topic=ap-politics
    
    -Declan
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 30 2001 - 21:19:31 PDT