FC: Frank Sudia's proposal: Let's revive encryption key escrow

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Sun Sep 16 2001 - 16:04:20 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Canada's B'nai Brith calls for Net-censorship after attacks"

    Frank Sudia's bio says that he is a programmer, a lawyer, a public policy 
    analyst, and a co-founder of the CertCo encryption company, formerly part 
    of Bankers Trust. He is also the creator of the "Bankers Trust Corporate 
    Key Escrow System."
    
    His paper (see the link below)  is a suggestion for a route for Congress to 
    take if they "decided to require all encryption systems to be readable by 
    authorized legal authorities."
    
    -Declan
    
    **********
    
    From: "Frank Sudia" <fsudiaat_private>
    Saturday: September 15, 2001 02:14 AM
    To:   <info@security-policy.org>
           <mailboxat_private>
           "Dorothy Denning" <denningat_private>
           "Stewart Baker" <SBakerat_private>
    Subject:  Encryption and the Restoration of National Sovereignty
    
    Dear Policy Professional,
    
    In response to the Attack on America, I have drawn upon my extensive work in
    secure banking systems, key escrow systems, and patent licensing to bring
    you the following white paper (about 10 pages of text).
    
    Frank W. Sudia, JD, "Encryption and the Restoration of National Sovereignty:
    Proposal for an Escrow Patent Pool Corporation," September 14, 2001.
    
         http://www.sudialab.com/sov-eppc.htm.
    
    While at Bankers Trust (1991-98) I designed one of the largest encryption
    systems in the world, the Global Trust Organization.  Chartered in 1999 as
    Identrus LLC (www.identrus.com) it now includes 50 of the world's largest
    banks.
    
    In my view, encryption policy options are poorly understood.  The power of
    government to protect the nation should not be in doubt, yet the debate has
    been skewed by the claims of opponents that such systems will not or cannot
    work.
    
    In reality, it would be straightforward to build a system that is much more
    secure than the current banking system.  However, this has not been done,
    and cannot be done, because complex patent problems must be resolved.
    
    Before anything serious and believable can ever be built, even on a test
    basis, we must aggregate the required patents into product pools, using
    government money and eminent domain powers, if necessary.  And we must fund
    the development of prototypes.  Only after viability has been established
    can the commercial sector move forward with products that are highly secure
    and credible.
    
    For further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.  If you are a
    contact or friend of mine, I would appreciate comments, which will be
    acknowledged in any future version.
    
    Regards,
    Frank Sudia
    
    www.SudiaLab.com
    415-648-7415
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Sep 16 2001 - 16:16:14 PDT