FC: Reports from DC: Bush anti-terror bill, pro-liberty coalition

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Wed Sep 19 2001 - 08:04:43 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Text of "Mobilization Against Terrorism Act" now online"

    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46953,00.html
    
        Bush Bill Rewrites Spy Laws
        By Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
        2:00 a.m. Sep. 19, 2001 PDT
    
        WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration will ask for more power to
        eavesdrop on phone calls, the Internet and voicemail messages,
        according to an outline of a bill obtained by Wired News.
    
        In response to last week's catastrophic terrorist attacks, President
        Bush plans to ask Congress to approve far-reaching legislation that
        rewrites U.S. laws dealing with electronic surveillance, immigration
        and support for terrorists.
    
        "We will call upon the Congress of the United States to enact these
        important anti-terrorism measures this week," Attorney General John
        Ashcroft said Monday. "We need these tools to fight the terrorism
        threat which exists in the United States, and we must meet that
        growing threat."
    
        According to the two-page outline -- which lacks key details and could
        change before it's sent to Capitol Hill -- police would be able to
        conduct more wiretaps and use the Carnivore surveillance system in
        more situations without court orders. That section of the bill appears
        to mirror an amendment the Senate approved last Thursday evening.
    
        No restrictions on encryption products, a prospect feared by some
        civil libertarians, appear in the outline.
    
        The bill hands prosecutors a courtroom edge, saying that accused
        terrorists should stay in jail by default, that detention of suspected
        terrorists is "mandatory," and that the Immigration and Naturalization
        Service will have more authority to kick immigrants suspected of being
        terrorists out of the United States.
    
        [...]
    
    **********
    
    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46959,00.html
    
        Coalition to Congress: Slow Down
        By Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
        7:00 a.m. Sep. 19, 2001 PDT
    
        WASHINGTON -- Dozens of groups worried about the future of free
        speech, privacy and other liberties in wartime have gathered together
        to ask Congress to tread carefully.
    
        A quickly organized alliance of liberal, libertarian and conservative
        organizations, tentatively named the In Defense of Freedom coalition,
        says legislators should not rush to rewrite wiretapping, immigration
        and surveillance laws.
    
        At noon Thursday, the group will hold a press conference at the
        National Press Club to present a list of principles they hope Congress
        will follow when weighing laws in response to last week's attacks on
        the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
    
        [...]
    
    **********
    
    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46900,00.html
    
        Geeks Gather to Back Crypto
        By Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
        2:00 a.m. Sep. 17, 2001 PDT
    
        CATONSVILLE, Maryland -- Rob Carlson is worried about something that
        most Americans would consider entirely obscure: the future of
        encryption technology.
    
        Carlson, a 21-year-old programmer who typically sports a floppy,
        pin-studded safari hat, fears that the U.S. Congress, in the wake of
        last week's bloody attacks, may vote for anti-terrorism legislation
        that also threatens privacy. "There's nothing as permanent as a
        temporary restriction," he says.
    
        In an announcement distributed online Friday, Carlson suggested that
        like-minded geeks gather at the University of Maryland's Baltimore
        County campus on Saturday and Sunday "in order to get the word out
        about the importance of civil liberties" and prepare for the worst on
        Capitol Hill.
    
    **********
    
    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,46915,00.html
    
        What Future War Looks Like
        By Declan McCullagh and Ben Polen
        2:00 a.m. Sep. 18, 2001 PDT
    
        President Bush has warned of a "different type of war" on terrorism.
        Wired News asked Stephen Sloan, a professor of political science at
        the University of Oklahoma, what a 21st century war might mean.
        Sloan's books include Simulating Terrorism and the Historical
        Dictionary of Terrorism. He has also served as a consultant to the
        U.S. military.
    
        [...]
    
    **********
    
    From: "Bridis, Ted" <Ted.Bridisat_private>
    To: "'declanat_private'" <declanat_private>
    Subject: DOJ seeks changes to law on bio attacks
    Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:11:14 -0400
    
    http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB1000851795317977400.htm
    
    September 19, 2001
    
    Justice Department Seeks Approval
    For Wide Antiterrorism Legislation
    
    By TED BRIDIS
    Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    
    WASHINGTON -- The Justice Department is asking Congress to approve
    unexpectedly wide-ranging antiterrorism legislation that includes provisions
    covering everything from criminals wielding biological weapons, to use of
    DNA in terrorist investigations and police seizure of office voice mail.
    
    A draft of the proposal, called the Mobilization Against Terrorism Act and
    provided to Republican lawmakers this week, includes sections on
    intelligence, immigration, corporate records sought by police, U.S.
    cooperation with foreign governments and tax disclosures. The draft goes
    beyond specific requests to Congress made this week by Attorney General John
    Ashcroft, who has so far focused publicly on the need for legislation to
    relax restrictions on telephone and Internet wiretaps, and to strengthen
    laws against money laundering.
    
    The speed with which such proposals are moving -- the Senate already
    approved some changes to U.S. wiretap laws last week -- has alarmed some
    critics who say the Justice Department hasn't adequately explained its
    sweeping plans.
    
    Mr. Ashcroft said the changes are needed "to be able to fight effectively
    against terrorism," and he praised lawmakers for "their ideas, their
    comments, their suggestions and their support for a package that we would
    hope to have ready in the next few days." Some criticism has come from
    Republican lawmakers. In a letter to Mr. Ashcroft, Rep. Bob Barr of Georgia
    warned of a "vast expansion of government power in a misguided attempt to
    protect freedom," an effort that would "inevitably erode the very freedoms
    we seek to protect."
    
    National civil-liberties groups have quietly joined to form a single
    coalition, to be announced tomorrow, to urge that Congress and the White
    House take more time to weigh the Justice Department's requests.
    Representatives of dozens of these groups met here late last week to draft a
    statement of principles. The groups include the American Civil Liberties
    Union, the Center for Democracy and Technology and the Free Congress
    Foundation, as well as immigration, Arab-American and church groups.
    
    The proposals include "things that are subject to abuse, that will be
    abused," said Morton H. Halperin, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign
    Relations. "We're going to try to slow down the process, so that these
    things are done in an orderly and public way."
    
    "Policy makers are being careful figuring out who to target in the Middle
    East," added Jerry Berman, head of the Center for Democracy and Technology.
    "They should be just as careful to figure out what to target in the
    Constitution, so we don't experience collateral damage."
    
    The coalition hasn't invited any corporations to join, believing that
    companies would be reluctant to give the impression that they oppose
    antiterrorism measures. But some proposals, including one affecting
    "business records" sought by police, could be costly for corporations if it
    is mandated that records be retained for long periods. The technology
    industry previously has fought requirements that Internet companies keep
    records about subscribers' use of the Internet, citing high costs and
    privacy concerns. "We're not in the data-storage business," said America
    Online spokesman Nicholas Graham.
    
    "It's got everybody's antenna twitching," said Harris Miller, head of the
    Information Technology Association of America, which isn't part of the
    coalition. "Clearly if it does affect things like record retention, then it
    potentially creates huge expense, liability and privacy issues."
    
    Many companies probably will do much of their lobbying behind the scenes.
    AOL Time Warner Inc., the Internet and entertainment company, is "deeply
    interested in learning the details of each proposal," Mr. Graham said.
    
    Mr. Halperin said the civil-liberties groups face the same dilemma, risking
    a public impression that they are soft on terrorism if they oppose the
    Justice Department's proposals.
    
    **********
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 19 2001 - 08:37:17 PDT