FC: International update: Germany, Switzerland, France, China, Canada

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Wed Oct 17 2001 - 10:58:14 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Congress reaches compromise on USA Act: Four-year expiration"

    *********
    
    Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:39:48 +0200
    From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
    To: Axel H Horns <hornsat_private>
    Cc: debateat_private, declanat_private
    Subject: Re: [FYI] (Fwd) FC: German state moves to block "illegal" sites 
    including
    
    On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 09:13:22AM +0200, Axel H Horns wrote:
    
    >[Rotten.com is certainly in poor taste, which I believe is the point,
    >but illegal? Heavens. Now some Germans will no longer be able to get
    >their daily dose of Bonsai Kittens, hosted at rotten.com.
    
    Just for the record, I can access rotten.com right now from within 
    Nordrhein-Westfalen.  It doesn't seem like the blocking effort is terribly 
    successful.
    
    -- 
    Thomas Roessler                      <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
    
    *********
    
    Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:26:43 +0200
    From: Matthias Leisi <matthiasat_private>
    To: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>
    Subject: Re: FC: German state moves to block "illegal" sites including 
    rotten.com
    In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20011016193919.00ab6da0at_private>; from 
    declanat_private on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 07:51:41PM -0700
    
    (Context: http://www.politechbot.com/p-02662.html)
    
    Swiss authorities have tried similar approaches in the (not-so-distant) past.
    
    In January/Februar 2001, under the pressure of a group which calls itself
    "Aktion Kinder des Holocaust" (Action of Holocaust Children) swiss ISPs were
    asked to block traffic to a yet unkown number of (nazi propaganda) sites.
    
    SIUG (Swiss Internet Users Group) asked ISPs directly as to what sites they
    were blocking, but only few responded (mainly those who said they were not
    blocking anything). But two large backbone providers (Sunrise.ch and
    IP/Plus, subsidiary of former monopolist Swisscom) were blocking access to
    at least some sites. See SIUG Press Release at
    
    http://www.siug.ch/presse/Presse.20010629.html
    
    Already in 1998, Swiss authorities requested that ISPs shut down
    connectivity to a number of sites (a transcript of this letter is available
    at http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&selm=an_374548192 ).
    
    There is no sound legal base for those attempts at censorship _yet_. There
    are some provision in terms of laws on anti-hate speech already in place,
    and two parliamentary initiatives to clarify the situation for ISPs are
    underway:
    
    http://www.parlament.ch/ab/frameset/d/n/4609/35656/d_n_4609_35656_35784.htm
    
    Matthias
    (Disclaimer: Member of SIUG)
    
    *********
    
    From: "Thomas Leavitt" <thomasleavittat_private>
    To: declanat_private
    Subject: Re: FC: German state moves to block "illegal" sites including 
    rotten.com
    Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 05:55:15 -0700
    
    Germany's big ISP, T-Online blocked us (I think at the direction of the 
    government) but backed down in the face of massively bad pr.
    
    Switzerland blocked us due to zundelsite at core routers for years, and we 
    couldn't do anything about it.
    
    Egypt blocked us for years due to porn, I think.
    
    Hazard of running a free speech oriented shared hosting service.
    
    Thomas
    
    *********
    
    Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:44:14 +0200
    From: Alexander Svensson <alexanderat_private>
    To: declanat_private
    Subject: Re: FC: German state moves to block "illegal" sites including
      rotten.com
    
    Hi Declan!
    
    Some additional info:
     > [Rotten.com is certainly in poor taste, which I believe is the point, but
     > illegal? Heavens.
    
    http://www.bonnanwalt.de/entscheidungen/NRWBezReg-Duesseldorf21-xxxx.html
    This is the text of the Nordrhein-Westfalen decision,
    with the site names xxx'ed out. d) clearly refers
    to rotten.com:
    
       Angebote im Internet sind unzulässig, wenn sie
       1. gegen Bestimmungen des Strafgesetzbuches verstoßen
       (§ 8 Abt 1 Nr. 1 MdStV),
       2. den Krieg verherrlichen (§ 8 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 MdStV),
       3. offensichtlich geeignet sind, Kinder oder Jugendliche
       sittlich schwer zu gefährden (§ 8 Abs. 1 Nr. 3 MdStV),
       4. Menschen, die sterben oder schweren körperlichen oder
       seelischen Leiden ausgesetzt sind oder waren, in einer
       die Menschenwürde verletzenden Weise darstellen und
       ein tatsachliches Geschehen wiedergeben, ohne dass
       ein überwiegendes berechtigtes Interesse gerade an
       dieser Form der Berichterstattung vorliegt; eine
       Einwilligung ist unbeachtlich (§ 8 Abs. 1 Nr. 4 MdStV),
    [...]
       d) http://www.xxxxx.com
       Auf der Seite dieses amerikanischen Content-Provider, der
       gleichzeitig sein Angebot hostet, wird auf zynische Art
       und Weise Gewalt- und Kriegsverherrlichung betrieben.
       Weiterhin werden in unzähligen Bildern Unfall- und
       Gewaltopfer unter Nichtbeachtung der Menschenwürde
       gezeigt. Eine Unzulässigkeit dieser Angebote ergibt sich
       nicht nur aus dem Verstoß gegen die o.g. Rechtsvorschriften
       unter den Nrn. 1 und 2 ( § 130, 130a und 86 StGB) sowie
       Nr. 3 (sittliche Gefährdung von Kindern und Jugendlichen),
       sondern insbesondere gegen die Nrn. 4 und 5 - Menschen
       werden in einer die Menschenwürde verletzenden Weise
       dargestellt -.
    
    My translation:
       Internet presentations are inadmissible, if they
       1. contravene penal code regulations
       (§ 8 section 1 nr. 1 interstate treaty on media services)
       2. glorify war (§ 8 section 1 nr. 2)
       3. are obviously capable of morally endangering children
       or young people seriously (§ 8 section 1 nr. 3),
       4. depict people that are dying or are exposed to
       severe physical or mental suffering in a way violating
       human dignity and portray an actual event without
       there being an overwhelming legitimate interest in
       exactly this form of reporting; a consent is not
       to be considered (§ 8 section 1 nr. 4),
    [...]
    
       d) http://www.xxxxx.com
       On the page of this American content provider, which at
       the same time is hosting its presentation, there is
       glorification of violence and war in a cyncial way. Furthermore,
       victims of accidents and violence are shown in countless
       picture failing to observe human dignity. The inadmissibility
       of these presentations does not only follow from the
       regulations mentioned above under nr. 1 and 2 (§130, 130a
       and 86 criminal code) and nr. 3 (moral threat to children
       and young people), but especially against nr. 4 and 5
       -- people are depicted in a manner violating human dignity.
    
     > Now some Germans will no longer be able to get their
     > daily dose of Bonsai Kittens, hosted at rotten.com.
    
    Not all of Germany is subject to this, only a number
    of Nordrhein-Westfalen access providers. And sites /hosted/
    at rotten.com are, IIUC, not subject to this ban, only
    the website at www.rotten.com, so Bonsai Kittens should
    not be concerned.
    
    Best regards,
    /// Alexander
    
    *********
    
    Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:30:37 +0100
    To: declanat_private
    From: Yaman Akdeniz <lawya@cyber-rights.org>
    Subject: Case Analysis of the Yahoo case
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    
    Declan,
    
    I have written a case analysis of (the Yahoo case) League Against Racism 
    and Antisemitism (LICRA), French Union of Jewish Students, v Yahoo! Inc. 
    (USA), Yahoo France, Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (The County Court 
    of Paris), Interim Court Order, 20 November, 2000.
    
    This has been now published in [2001] Electronic Business Law Reports, 1(3) 
    110-120 and a pdf version is available at:
    
    http://www.cyber-rights.org/documents/yahoo_ya.pdf
    
    It may be of interest to your readers.
    
    All the best,
    
    Yaman
    
    
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Mr. Yaman Akdeniz,
    Director, Cyber-Rights & Cyber-Liberties (UK)
    URL: http://www.cyber-rights.org
    E-mail: lawya@cyber-rights.org
    Tel: +44 (0)7798 865116
    
    Use Free Secure Web based e-mail through
    http://www.cyber-rights.net
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    
    *********
    
    From: jamyangat_private
    Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:33:20 -0000
    To: <declanat_private>
    Subject: china (un)blocks sites
    
    They're down, they're up, they're down ... and now, websites based in the
    West are up again in China as the government lifts its blocks....or are they?
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Hi Declan,
    
    Reuters team in Shanghai for the APEC summit reports that China has unblocked
    certain news sites
    
    http://wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,47622,00.html
    
    a reverse trace route suggests that while these website's are now going
    through the international gateway in Shanghai, the Beijing gateway is again
    blocking them. (it was briefly available via beijing gateway on tuesday).
    
    this would seem to suggest to me that these major media outlets are
    available purely for the benefit of the media assembled for the summit, and
    does not represent a siginificant policy change on the part of the Chinese
    government.
    
    I have been watching this process closely recently, particularly since i am
    releasing a report on the impact of the internet on human rights in china on
    thursday, 18 october, 1100 (EST).
    
    Amongst other systems, the report analyses the tracking capability of the hi-
    speed metro area network that has been installed in the international media
    centre for the 3000+ journalists to use to file their stories from the summit
    this week. the report is accompanied by a cd-rom that provides people in
    china with a range of tools for circumventing censorship and surveillance
    software.
    
    if you would be interested in recieving a copy of my report, or have any
    futher questions, please don't hesitate to get in contact.
    
    
    best,
    
    greg walton
    
    *********
    
    From: Sonia Arrison <sarrisonat_private>
    To: "'canucksat_private'" <canucksat_private>
    Subject: CANUCKS: More on Cdn anti-terrorism bill
    Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 12:36:38 -0700
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    X-URL: Canucks is at http://www.canadiansintheus.com/
    
    Below is the Canadian government's press release as well as a CBC link.
    -Sonia
    
    http://www.cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view.cgi?/news/2001/10/15/terror_law0110
    15
    
    http://canada.justice.gc.ca/en/news/nr/2001/doc_27785.html
    
    
    GOVERNMENT OF CANADA INTRODUCES ANTI-TERRORISM ACT
    OTTAWA, October 15, 2001 - The Government of Canada today introduced in the
    House of Commons a new package of anti-terrorism measures as part of its
    Anti-Terrorism Plan. This package takes aim at terrorist organizations and
    strengthens investigation, prosecution and prevention of terrorist
    activities at home and abroad.
    
    The Honourable Anne McLellan, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of
    Canada, the Honourable Lawrence MacAulay, Solicitor General of Canada, and
    the Honourable John Manley, Minister of Foreign Affairs, announced the
    details of the proposed Anti-Terrorism Act.
    
    "The horrific events of September 11 remind us that we must continue to work
    with other nations to confront terrorism and ensure the full force of
    Canadian law is brought to bear against those who support, plan and carry
    out acts of terror - we will cut off their money, find them and punish
    them," said Minister McLellan. "
    
    The Government of Canada Anti-Terrorism Plan has four objectives:
    
    
    stop terrorists from getting into Canada and protect Canadians from
    terrorist acts;
    
    
    bring forward tools to identify, prosecute, convict and punish terrorists;
    
    
    prevent the Canada-US border from being held hostage by terrorists and
    impacting on the Canadian economy; and
    
    
    work with the international community to bring terrorists to justice and
    address the root causes of such hatred.
    
    "As a nation, we must be prepared to ensure our safety and security. This
    legislation will provide our law enforcement and national security agencies
    with additional tools to identify and dismantle terrorist organizations and
    prevent terrorist acts," said Minister MacAulay.
    
    "These measures are in keeping with the actions of our allies," said
    Minister Manley. "They are an important element in Canada's commitment to
    join its international partners in confronting and stamping out terrorism
    around the world."
    
    The proposed Anti-Terrorism Act includes measures to identify, prosecute,
    convict and punish terrorists, such as:
    
    
    defining and designating terrorist groups and activities to make it easier
    to prosecute terrorists and those who support them;
    
    
    making it an offence to knowingly participate in, contribute to or
    facilitate the activities of a terrorist group or to instruct anyone to
    carry out a terrorist activity or an activity on behalf of a terrorist
    group;
    
    
    making it an offence to knowingly harbour a terrorist;
    
    
    creating tougher sentences and parole provisions for terrorist offences;
    
    
    cutting off financial support for terrorists by making it a crime to
    knowingly collect or give funds, either directly or indirectly, in order to
    carry out terrorism, denying or removing charitable status from those who
    support terrorist groups, and by making it easier to freeze and seize their
    assets; and
    
    
    ratifying two UN anti-terrorism conventions, the International Convention
    for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and the International
    Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, as well as the Safety
    of United Nations and Associated Personnel Convention.
    
    The bill will give law enforcement and national security agencies new
    investigative tools to gather knowledge about and prosecute terrorists and
    terrorist groups, as well as protect Canadians from terrorist acts,
    including:
    
    
    making it easier to use electronic surveillance against terrorist groups;
    
    
    creating new offences targeting unlawful disclosure of certain information
    of national interest;
    
    
    amending the Canada Evidence Act to guard certain information of national
    interest from disclosure during courtroom or other judicial proceedings;
    
    
    amending the National Defence Act to continue and clarify the mandate of the
    Communications Security Establishment (CSE) to collect foreign
    communications;
    
    
    within carefully defined limits, allowing the arrest, detention and
    imposition of conditions of release on suspected terrorists to prevent
    terrorist acts and save lives;
    
    
    requiring individuals who have information related to a terrorist group or
    offence to appear before a judge to provide that information; and
    
    
    extending the DNA warrant scheme and data bank to include terrorist crimes.
    
    These necessary measures target people and activities that pose a threat to
    the security and well being of Canadians. This is a struggle against
    terrorism, and not against any one community, group or faith. Diversity is
    one of Canada's greatest strengths, and the Government of Canada is taking
    steps to protect it. Measures will be included in the bill to address the
    root causes of hatred and to ensure Canadian values of equality, tolerance
    and fairness are affirmed in the wake of the September 11 attacks. These
    include:
    
    
    amending the Criminal Code to eliminate online hate propaganda and create a
    new offence of mischief against places of religious worship or religious
    property; and
    
    
    amending the Canadian Human Rights Act to extend the prohibition against
    hate messages beyond telephone messages to include all telecommunications
    technologies.
    
    The proposed Anti-Terrorism Act includes rigorous checks and balances in
    order to uphold the rights and freedoms of Canadians. For example, the scope
    of Criminal Code provisions is clearly defined to ensure that they only
    apply to terrorists and terrorist groups. The Act will also be subject to a
    Parliamentary review in three years.
    
    The scope of the proposed Anti-Terrorism Act is consistent with Canada's
    legal framework, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the
    requirement for due process, and the consent of the Attorney General and
    judicial review where appropriate. These measures are also in keeping with
    actions taken by Canada's international partners against terrorism.
    
    "The measures we are introducing strike the right balance between civil
    liberties and national security, and signal our resolve to ensure that
    Canadians will not be paralyzed by acts of terrorism," said Minister
    McLellan.
    
    The Act builds on Canada's longstanding and continuing contribution to the
    global campaign against terrorism. Under the Criminal Code, terrorists can
    already be prosecuted for hijacking, murder and other acts of violence.
    Canadian courts also have the jurisdiction to try a number of terrorist
    crimes committed abroad to ensure that terrorists are brought to justice,
    regardless of where the offence was committed. Canada has already ratified
    10 of 12 United Nations counter-terrorism conventions and, with this bill,
    will be able to ratify the remaining two. The proposed legislation also
    builds on regulations introduced by the Government of Canada on October 3,
    2001 following a UN Security Council resolution, to cut terrorists off from
    their financial support.
    
    - 30 -
    
    Ref:
    
    Farah Mohamed
    Minister McLellan's Office
    (613) 992-4621
    
    Dan Brien
    Minister MacAulay's Office
    (613) 991-2924
    
    Sanjeev Chowdhury
    Press Secretary
    Office of the Minister of Foreign Affairs
    (613) 995-1851
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    CANUCKS -- the moderated mailing list for Canadians living in the U.S.
    For details, visit http://www.canadiansintheus.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    *********
    
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 17 2001 - 08:30:13 PDT