FC: Lizard replies to ACLU demanding more Internet regulation

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 23:11:20 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: City of Kirkland drops lawsuit aginst Justicefiles.org"

    [Original ACLU press release follows. --Declan]
    
    ---
    
    Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 09:44:05 -0700
    From: lizard <lizardat_private>
    To: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>
    
    Well, first off, the Internet always HAS been under (mostly) private 
    control. The vast majority of the computers which compose the Internet are 
    privately owned, and the owners of those systems have always been able to 
    bounce traffic, censor traffic, read traffic, etc.
    
    >"Second, citizens and community groups must play an
    >aggressive role in shaping the future of the high-speed Internet,
    >especially ensuring that local networks offer a diversity of
    >broadband content and services."
    
    Scary stuff.
    
    The value of the Internet has always been in the fact anyone can post 
    content. The idea that someone must mandate "diverse content" is rather 
    terrifying. What it means, in reality, is that the ACLU is unhappy with 
    what people CHOOSE to put on the net, thus, someone (i.e, you and me) 
    should be required to fund content which the ACLU finds more pleasing.
    
    For all their pretenses of populism and democracy, the left is extremely 
    elitist. When confronted with the raw truth of what the masses WANT to 
    read, see, or listen to, they fall back in terror, squeaking piteously of 
    'the public interest', all the while ignoring the fact that no one in the 
    public is interested.
    
    Anyone who claims that there's nothing but predigested corporate pap on the 
    net need only go to http://www.yamara.com/junk/xl970512.html to see what 
    true diversity is all about. You'll never, not in a million years, have 
    anyone on NPR or PBS tell you how to say "Oh my god, there's an axe in my 
    head" in Klingon.
    
    ---
    
    ACLU Warns of Threat to Online Free Speech From Cable Monopolies
    
    Technical Report Shows How Cable Operators Can Interfere With Internet
    Access
    
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Wednesday, July 10, 2002
    
    Contact: Barry Steinhardt, ACLU, 917.349.4893 (on 7/10) or
    212.549.2508 (after 7/10);
    Jay Stanley, ACLU, 202.715.0818;
    Jeffrey Chester, CDD, 202.452.9898
    
    WASHINGTON - The American Civil Liberties Union today called on the
    government to protect the Internet from the power of monopolistic
    cable providers and issued twin reports examining the technical and
    policy sides of the issue.
    
    "Many people don't realize that if current policies continue, a
    handful of big monopolies will gain power over information flowing
    through the Internet," said Barry Steinhardt, Director of the ACLU's
    Technology and Liberty Program. "Freedom of speech doesn't mean much
    if the forums where that speech takes place are not free."
    
    The first report issued today is a 78-page technical study
    commissioned by the ACLU -
    http://www.aclu.org/issues/cyber/broadband_report.pdf - and prepared
    by a Maryland-based telecommunications engineering consulting firm,
    the Columbia Telecommunications Corporation (CTC). The second report
    is a brief ACLU policy analysis -
    http://www.aclu.org/issues/cyber/NoCompetition.pdf
    
    At issue is the ongoing conversion by consumers from a dial-up
    Internet (based on slow modem connections over phone lines) to far
    faster "broadband" connections (mostly using cable modems). With
    dial-up, Internet access is provided over a medium that provides
    open, equal access to all: the telephone system. But with the shift
    to cable, Internet access must be adapted to a medium that has been
    far more subject to centralized control. The danger, the ACLU said,
    is that the Internet will come under private control.
    
    "The path out of this predicament is clear," said Jeff Chester,
    Executive Director of the Center for Digital Democracy, which
    collaborated in preparation of the reports. "First, the FCC must act
    to preserve the Internet's open, common-carrier status in the cable
    context. Second, citizens and community groups must play an
    aggressive role in shaping the future of the high-speed Internet,
    especially ensuring that local networks offer a diversity of
    broadband content and services."
    
    The report by CTC includes an in-depth examination of two cable
    systems (in Portland, OR and Tacoma, WA) and interviews with
    officials at two Internet Service Providers that have been excluded
    from many cable broadband systems.
    
    Among the report's findings and recommendations:
    
    - There are no insurmountable technical barriers to open access on
    most U.S. cable systems;
    
    - Broadband cable companies should adopt a "public interest
    architecture" based on principles such as maximizing consumer choice
    and competition among ISPs;
    
    - The dominant emerging technique for allowing multiple ISPs on cable
    Internet networks, which CTC calls "rebranding and resale of
    wholesale services," actually leaves the cable operator in control of
    the product. As a result, it creates only the illusion of real
    competition and consumer choice, and is not true open access.
    
    "Our finding is that there are no technical reasons why the policies
    backed by the ACLU and other advocates cannot be adopted," said Dr.
    Andrew Afflerbach, Vice President of CTC and an author of the report.
    
    The ACLU's policy analysis explains how the government is failing to
    extend to the broadband Internet crucial regulatory protections that
    help keep today's Internet free and open to all. Unless the
    government changes course, the ACLU warns, a handful of large
    corporations will have both the incentive and the ability to
    interfere with the free flow of information across the network.
    
    "Protecting free expression on the Internet is a high priority for
    the ACLU," said Steinhardt. "In the same way that we have battled
    Internet censorship by the government, we will also fight to make
    sure that private corporations aren't allowed to get into a position
    where they can dictate what we read and say online."
    
    The ACLU policy analysis and the CTC report are online at
    http://www.aclu.org/issues/cyber/broadband.html
    The Center for Digital Democracy is online at
    http://www.democraticmedia.org
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 18 2002 - 01:56:10 PDT