FC: Economist on privacy: "People are voluntarily relinquishing it"

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Sat Aug 17 2002 - 08:02:43 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: How bad is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act?"

    [Again, as I've written many times, people are making their own 
    cost-benefit decisions in each one of these transactions... --Declan]
    
    ---
    
    From: "Alana Lowe-Petraske" <lowe_petraskeat_private>
    To: declanat_private
    Cc: prodigalgrrlat_private
    Subject: economist surveillance coverage
    Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:02:51 +0000
    
    Hello Declan-- I am an avid reader of politech )and thought i might point 
    out these two articles in today's economist on surveillance. I don't know 
    if this is out of the ordinary, it just seemed like abundant coverage.
    ps-your list has helped me beyond measure in my research on the 'war on 
    internet piracy' in the music industry -- thanks!
    kind regards, alana
    
    http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=1280806
    "Surveillance and privacy:Go on, watch me
    Aug 15th 2002
     From The Economist print edition
    People are voluntarily surrendering their privacy
    GEORGE ORWELL got it wrong—thank goodness. In the developed world, it is 
    not the state that has ushered in a “Big Brother” society but society 
    itself. Every day, people are adopting new technologies that trade a small 
    amount of their privacy for greater convenience and security: credit cards, 
    smart cards in electronic tollbooths, customer loyalty cards, 
    cash-withdrawal machines, and “cookies” on computers. As for surveillance 
    cameras, they have become so widely accepted that they have bred a genre of 
    mass entertainment in the form of so-called reality TV, some even using 
    Orwell's phrase. In all these respects, it is individuals that are deciding 
    to sacrifice privacy in exchange for something they want more. But are 
    there hidden costs, that society as a whole ought to worry about? After 
    all, if governments were to suggest the use of some of these technologies, 
    there would be a public outcry.
    Where the public wants security, the willingness to give up privacy is 
    powerful. That bodes well for the companies hoping to sell personal 
    location technology to people who want to monitor the movement of their 
    pets and loved ones (see article). Worries about child abductions, for 
    example, mean that people are likely to welcome such devices. Here, the 
    loss of privacy is fairly clear, although they may raise tricky policy 
    questions in future—such as, at what age does your unruly teenager have the 
    right to remove her tracking chip?
    But the loss of privacy may be less obvious where people trade privacy for 
    convenience. For example, later this year, a smart card will be introduced 
    to bring about cashless travel on London's underground, buses and train 
    services. Few of the 20m who use the capital's underground will realise 
    that the card, which will work from inside a wallet or bag, will record 
    their daily movements for billing purposes. Mobile-phone companies hold 
    data on an individual's calls and movements. Shops hold details of 
    purchases. Such companies frequently bleat that personal data is secure and 
    inviolable. Yet the police, tax authorities and security services can 
    usually gain access to such data to pursue an investigation or prosecution.
    I know what you did last night
    At the very least, data needs better protection from outside hackers and 
    from those insiders with access to it. The Federation of American 
    Scientists reasonably argues that potential abuses of data-collection 
    systems can and should be anticipated and prevented. All data banks should 
    have big penalties for unauthorised uses, as well as an oversight system 
    such as an ombudsman or public review board.
    (......)
    
    http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?Story_id=1280634
    Surveillance:Something to watch over you
    Aug 15th 2002
     From The Economist print edition
    GlobeXplorer
    It is easier than ever for individuals to track their possessions, pets and 
    loved ones
    HILLARY CLINTON is supposed to have said of her husband that he was a “hard 
    dog to keep on the porch”. She is not alone. All over the world, dogs, 
    husbands, children and even inanimate objects are liable to stray from the 
    home—whether willingly or otherwise. Now, though, the technology exists to 
    keep track of them.
    In fact, the new generation of tracking devices combines two existing 
    technologies. One is a global-positioning-system (GPS) chip, which uses 
    radio signals from a network of satellites to work out where it is on the 
    earth's surface to within a few metres. The other is a mobile-telephone 
    chip, which broadcasts that location to whoever needs to know it. The 
    result is a pocket-sized, or even wrist-sized, personal locator.
    Track to the future
    Applied Digital Solutions (ADS), of Palm Beach, Florida, calls its version 
    of the technology a “digital angel”. The angel comes in two versions. 
    People get a pager-like device that clips on to their clothing. Animals get 
    a collar.
    The angel is intended to look after old people who have become forgetful 
    and young children who have become too adventurous, as well as dogs who are 
    too interested in the bitch next door. The wearer's guardians define a 
    perimeter beyond which they feel their charge should not wander, and 
    receive alerts via mobile phone or pager when he has gone beyond these 
    boundaries.
    The digital angel can also issue an alert when its wearer has fallen down, 
    or when there has been an unexpected change in local temperature of the 
    sort that might be caused, say, by someone falling into a pond. For that to 
    happen, the wearer needs to sport a specially modified wristwatch which has 
    suitable sensors and a wireless link to the pager. Moreover, ADS claims to 
    be on the verge of introducing a version of the watch that can collect and 
    broadcast medical data such as pulse rate, blood pressure, body 
    temperature, electrocardiogram readings and even blood chemistry.
    ........)
    *******
    Alana Lowe-Petraske
    PhD Candidate
    Cardiff University
    33 Corbett Road
    Cardiff CF10 3EB
    Tel:02920.876626 Fax:0292087.6004
    
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q\clan
    CNET Radio 9:40 am ET weekdays: http://cnet.com/broadband/0-7227152.html
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 11:00:47 PDT