FC: Privacy villain of the week: DARPA's gait surveillance tech

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Sat Oct 26 2002 - 22:36:42 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Canada considers licensing Internet service providers"

    See also:
    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,38775,00.html
    
    ---
    
    Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:19:34 -0400
    From: J Plummer <jplummerat_private>
    Subject: NCP: Privacy Villain of the Week: DARPA's HumanID at a Distance
    
    Privacy Villain of the Week:
    DARPA's HumanID at a Distance
    
    The Defense Advance Research Projects Agency <http://www.darpa.mil/> has 
    been one of the more fruitful government agenies in the past, its DARPAnet 
    computer network being the foundation for what would become the Internet 
    some years later. That is why reading about what this outfit is up to now 
    can at times be disheartening. One such project is the HumanID at a 
    Distance program, which aims to move beyond face-recognition technology and 
    purportedly identify people by the way the walk.
    
    The idea here is that by measuring with video or (clothes-penetrating) 
    radar the distance between, say, 17 different points on the body 
    <http://gtresearchnews.gatech.edu/images/gait1.jpg> and measuring how these 
    points move in relation to one another, a person can be positively and 
    uniquely identified.
    
    This "gait technology" by itself is neutral of course, just as technologies 
    such as a gun or a needle or or the banging of flint against stone. The 
    problem here arises in that by funding such research, the government is 
    pushing a technology on society that it has not freely accepted through the 
    voluntary choices made in the market. A patina of legitimacy is 
    unfortunately added to such technologies when they have the imprimatur of 
    the state behind them.
    Even when the lead researchers on the project issue a press release 
    <http://gtresearchnews.gatech.edu/newsrelease/GAIT.htm> with conflictuing 
    estimations of accuracy ranging from .0001% to 95%.
    
    These selfsame researchers go on to tout the tech for use "around federal 
    buildings" and in airports (which have now had their security systems 
    completely taken over by the federal government). The airport situation is 
    particularly troubling, in that it would be installed after the new 
    Transportation Security Agency has complete control of all US airports. 
    Adding the full-body radar scans that are part of a gait-biometric system 
    to their CAPPS database incorporating name, Social Security number, credit 
    history, travel history, etc., is a small step. This would be another peice 
    of information in a federal database left wide open to abuse by not only 
    those with official and unofficial clearance but anyone who bribes or hacks 
    their way in.
    
    In addition, the potential for false positives seems to be overwhelming. 
    Even if the number is closer to 95% than .001%, what happens when a heavy 
    piece of luggage and lack of sleep slumps the shoulders enough to peg a 
    weary traveler as a dangerous terrorist? Is he or she strip-searched and 
    detained by armed federal employees while the plane to his mother's funeral 
    leaves for the other coast? This kind of technological forcing, especially 
    in situations controlled by the state, puts individuals in a position 
    where, due to lack of adequate societal knowledge, individuals are unable 
    to control the kind of information being disseminated about themselves.
    
    Identification technology has its uses. But when government forces it on 
    everyone, from a Social Security number onward, the long-term effects are 
    net negative -- oversurveillance , undersecurity, identity theft, etc. 
    DARPA scientists and their colleagues at places like Carnegie Mellon 
    <http://hid.ri.cmu.edu/> and Georgia Tech may be taking great strides 
    forward -- but do they recignize where to, or why this may earn them the 
    title of Privacy Villain of the Week?
    
    The Privacy Villain of the Week and Privacy Hero of the Month are projects 
    of the National Consumer Coalition's Privacy Group. Privacy Villain audio 
    features now available from FCF News on Demand. <http://www.fcfnews.com/> 
    For more information on the NCC Privacy Group, see www.nccprivacy.org or 
    contact James Plummer at 202-467-5809 or jplummerat_private . 
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Oct 27 2002 - 01:57:29 PDT