FC: Hurrah for Total Information Awareness!

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 16:06:19 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: "Too Much Information" on Poindexter's TIA, from The New Yorker"

    [The below essay is posted through an anonymous remailer. I have a
    queue of other TIA replies I'll post later tonight or
    tomorrow. Briefly, the essay highlights two different ways to protect
    your privacy: (a) Maintain control over your information and use
    technology to limit disclosure and linking with past behavior. See,
    for instance, Stefan Brands' work I wrote about nearly three years
    ago: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,34496,00.html or
    (b) Allow the Feds and companies to collect your information and rely
    on laws and government forbearance to protect your privacy. David
    Brin has written about some of the problems with (a) -- though I do
    not find his arguments persuasive -- and TIA shows us the problems of
    (b). Laws can change in a moment at the whim of Congress or the
    courts; technological methods won't. --Declan]
    
    
    ----- Forwarded message from Nomen Nescio <nobodyat_private> -----
    
    From: Nomen Nescio <nobodyat_private>
    Subject: Hooray for TIA
    Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:20:11 +0100 (CET)
    
    For years we cypherpunks have been telling you people that you are
    responsible for protecting your own privacy.  Use cash for purchases, look
    into offshore accounts, protect your online privacy with cryptography
    and anonymizing proxies.  But did you listen?  No.  You thought to
    trust the government.  You believed in transparency.  You passed laws,
    for Freedom of Information, and Protection of Privacy, and Insurance
    Accountability, and Fair Lending Practices.
    
    And now the government has turned against you.  It's Total Information
    Awareness program is being set up to collect data from every database
    possible.  Medical records, financial data, favorite web sites and email
    addresses, all will be brought together into a centralized office where
    every detail can be studied in order to build a profile about you.
    All those laws you passed, those government regulations, are being
    bypassed, ignored, flushed away, all in the name of National Security.
    
    Well, we fucking told you so.
    
    And don't try blaming the people in charge.  You liberals are cursing
    Bush, and Ashcroft, and Poindexter.  These laws were passed by the entire
    U.S. Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike.  Representatives have
    the full support of the American people; most were re-elected with
    large margins.  It's not Bush and company who are at fault, it's the
    whole idea that you can trust government to protect your privacy.
    
    All that data out there has been begging to be used.  It was only a
    matter of time.
    
    And you know what?  It's good that this has happened.  Not only has
    it shown the intellectual bankruptcy of trust-the-government privacy
    advocates, it proves what cypherpunks have been saying all along, that
    people must protect their own privacy.  The only way to keep your privacy
    safe is to keep the data from getting out there in the first place.
    
    Cypherpunks have consistently promoted two seemingly contradictory
    ideas.  The first is that people should protect data about themselves.
    The second is that they should have full access and usability for
    data they acquire about others.  Cypherpunks have supported ideas like
    Blacknet, and offshore data havens, places where data could be collected,
    consolidated and sold irrespective of government regulations.  The same
    encryption technologies which help people protect their privacy can be
    used to bypass attempts by government to control the flow of data.
    
    This two-pronged approach to the problem produces a sort of Darwinian
    competition between privacy protectors and data collectors.  It's not
    unlike the competition between code makers and code breakers, which has
    led to amazing enhancements in cryptography technology over the past
    few decades.  There is every reason to expect that a similar level of
    improvement and innovation can and will eventually develop in privacy
    protection and data management as these technologies continue to be
    deployed.
    
    But in the mean time, three cheers for TIA.  It's too bad that it's the
    government doing it rather than a shadowy offshore agency with virtual
    tentacles into the net, but the point is being made all the same.
    Now more than ever, people need privacy technology.  Government is not
    the answer.  It's time to start protecting ourselves, because nobody
    else is going to do it for us.
    
    ----- End forwarded message -----
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Dec 12 2002 - 16:22:09 PST