FC: Brian McWilliams replies about hoaxing Computerworld

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 21:13:31 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Politech administrative note"

    Previous Politech messages:
    
    "Hoax a reporter with a fake domain name, go to jail?"
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-04420.html
    
    "Reporter poses as Internet terrorist, dupes Computerworld"
    http://www.politechbot.com/p-04418.html
    
    This is a sad day for Internet journalism.
    
    -Declan
    
    ---
    
    From: "dan tynan" <danat_private>
    To: <declanat_private>, <politechat_private>
    Subject: Re: AP on reporter posing as Net-terrorist duping Computerworld
    Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 22:26:11 -0500
    
    Declan:
    
    Thought your readers might want to read Brian McWilliams' side of the story.
    He's posted an explanation of motives on his site at
    http://www.pc-radio.com/why.html. It also contains links to the original
    Computerworld stories, which the magazine has removed from its site.
    
    dan tynan
    contributing editor, pc world
    inside @cess, cnet
    danat_private
    
    ---
    
    Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 17:44:45 -0800
    To: declanat_private
    From: Bob Schuchman <schuchmanrat_private>
    Subject: Slammer Hoax
    
    Good old Google helped me find Brian McWilliams story on why he created the 
    Harkat Hoax.
    
    It's at http://www.pc-radio.com/why.html .
    
    ---
    
    From: "Christopher Null" <cnullat_private>
    To: <declanat_private>
    Subject: RE: Hoax a reporter with a fake domain name, go to jail?
    Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:07:10 -0800
    Organization: filmcritic.com
    
    HR 4640 or not, he's very possibly also guilty of Obstruction of Justice --
    same as providing a false lead during a police investigation or confessing
    to a crime you didn't commit.  Though he didn't make these statements to an
    official investigator, they did eventually become part of the public record
    with (malicious?) intent to mislead and during an ongoing investigation.
    
    The punishment is a fine and up to 10 years in prison, depending on the
    interpretation of the actual crime.
    
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Christopher Null / cnullat_private / journalist, film critic, novelist
    www.filmcritic.com - www.sutropress.com - www.chrisnull.com
    "Completely absorbing!" "Raw and frightening!" "Brilliant!" /
    www.sutropress.com
    See me read from HALF MAST at Barnes & Noble (Oakland - Jack London Square),
    Feb. 13, 7:30pm
    ------------------------------------------------------
    
    ---
    
    Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 21:17:53 -0500 (EST)
    From: Dean Anderson <deanat_private>
    To: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>
    cc: disenbergat_private
    Subject: Re: FC: Hoax a reporter with a fake domain name, go to jail?
    
    Bahahahahahaha.  Like that would be enforced. I can't get the FBI to
    investigate computer __crackers__ That is, people who break into computers
    with tools written by someone else, but who are themselves so inept that
    they leave behind everything but their home phone number. And their home
    phone number is no doubt easy to find, if you are the FBI.
    Unfortunately, script kiddies "are not a prosecution priority". No doubt,
    domain faker's aren't either.
    
    The NSA and the pentagon are interested in such things, but only in how
    the exploit worked, and whether any foreign government is behind the
    exploits. They don't prosecute anyone.  So if it turns out to
    uninteresting from an intelligence POV, then they are done with it.
    Frankly, that's a waste of my time.
    
    Most domain registrars' have policies against fake information on domains,
    and will frequently enforce those policies on complaints.  Some won't
    though. That is really the problem.  It would be better to make it a crime
    for any registrar (in the US or out) to knowingly accept false
    information, and not to cancel domains with fake information.  Registrars
    outside the US that don't comply with these policies will lose their
    accreditation as a registrar. (The ICANN/IETF which authorizes domain
    registrars is subject to US law)
    
    It would also be better to create a technology enforcement agency to
    enforce computer crime laws. Clearly, the FBI won't, and seems to have
    little competence in the subject.  We are in a situation similar to drug
    enforcement in the 70's. As you might recall, it was only after parents
    discovered their kids using drugs, and subsequently discovered that the
    FBI wouldn't enforce the drug laws, that the DEA was created.
    
    
    
    		--Dean
    
    ---
    
    Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:16:42 -0600 (CST)
    From: elijah wright <elwat_private>
    To: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>
    cc: politechat_private
    Subject: Re: FC: Hoax a reporter with a fake domain name, go to jail?
    
    
     >          Congressional legislation introduced (but not passed) last year
     > could have made McWilliams a criminal for what he did.  The legislation,
     > H.R. 4640, provided:
     >
     >          "Whoever knowingly and with intent to defraud provides material
     > and misleading false contact information to a domain name registrar,
     > domain name registry, or other domain name registration authority in
     > registering a domain name shall be fined under this title or imprisoned
     > not more than 5 years, or both."
     >          See http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.4640:
    
    so what about entities who're running Web sites on extremely unpopular
    topics (anti-war sites and pro-choice sites come to mind immediately...)
    who don't list much contact information at all?  would those persons have
    been prosecuted?
    
    i've seen a rash of sites lately that don't have correct contact
    information listed in WHOIS - many are corporations, rather than persons
    who would have any reason to conceal their identities.
    
    elijah
    
    ---
    
    Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:38:49 -0500 (EST)
    From: Dean Anderson <deanat_private>
    To: Declan McCullagh <declanat_private>
    cc: politechat_private
    Subject: Re: FC: Reporter poses as Internet terrorist, dupes Computerworld
    
    Oh please. 42 is the answer given by the computer Deep Thought to the
    question "what is the meaning of the life, the universe, and everthing" in
    Douglas Adams' "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" seriers.
    
    		--Dean
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 06 2003 - 21:45:05 PST