Previous Politech message: http://www.politechbot.com/p-04454.html --- From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <sureshat_private> To: <declanat_private> Subject: Re: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming? Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 20:04:10 +0530 On Thursday, February 13, 2003 7:06 PM [GMT+0530=IST], Declan McCullagh <declanat_private> wrote: > [Neil has been a reliable contributor to Politech for a while on the > topic of spam. But naturally I will give Spam Arrest the right of > reply, and forward unedited any response they choose to provide. > --Declan] More than one person has reported receiving this - spamarrest has apparently sent this letter to _anybody_ who sent mail to a spamarrest customer. This repurposing of addresses is blatant optout spam ... none of the people who sent mail to a spamarrest subscriber should be expected to receive solicitations from spamarrest. For what its worth, I was blocking spamarrest's IP as an open relay (running an antiquated version of CommuniGate Pro) which had relayed spam to our users, since the past several weeks. So, none of my users will have got this solicitation from them. srs --- rom: Amos Satterlee <asatterleeat_private> To: "'declanat_private'" <declanat_private> Subject: RE: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming? Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:00:40 -0500 Yeah, I got one, too. Addressed to our Sys Admin account, which is only a receive account. Funny thing is that they didn't send one to my person account. Definitely dictionary spam. Amos --- From: David Bolduc <dbolducat_private> To: "'declanat_private'" <declanat_private> Subject: RE: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming? Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:22:34 -0600 Me too. I have *no* recollection of having sent an email to a SpamArrest customer, or of visiting the SpamArrest site. --- From: "Brian Durham" <briandurhamat_private> To: <declanat_private> Subject: Re: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming? Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:15:11 -0600 Declan: I received that email from Spam Arrest Wednesday - same circumstances. Best, Brian Durham --- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:24:17 -0600 From: Kenneth Loafman <loafmanat_private> To: declanat_private Cc: politechat_private, supportat_private, prat_private Subject: Re: FC: Is Spam Arrest resorting to... spamming? As a matter of fact they are spamming. I got one in the mail this morning. I do remember responding to a SpamArrest customer, but that does not give SpamArrest itself permission to contact me. Promptly reported to SpamCop. ...Ken --- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice. To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/ Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?q=declan -------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Feb 13 2003 - 07:19:29 PST