FC: Privacy Foundation says censoring libraries == protecting privacy

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 22:23:28 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: IRS workers still abuse Net access, play games, download pr0n"

    Sometimes groups should stick to what they're good at, and this release 
    from the Privacy Foundation (which has done good work in other areas) is 
    one of those times. How can Keating claim with a straight face that 
    libraries do not carry "pornographic magazines" because it would violate 
    the "privacy" of a large number of their patrons? (For one thing, anyone 
    who's worried about their privacy could choose not to borrow that magazine.)
    
    The argument is just silly.
    
    I'm hardly an expert in this area but I do know a few things: 1. some 
    libraries do carry sexually-explicit material; 2. such material also is 
    commonly available via interlibrary loan; 3. libraries that don't carry 
    such materials typically do it because it doesn't fit with collection 
    development policies, because such materials are often stolen or destroyed, 
    and sometimes (if truth be told) because of community pressure. In any 
    case, the "privacy" rights of patrons have nothing to do with it.
    
    -Declan
    
    ---
    
    Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 16:06:28 -0600
    Subject: Media Tipsheet: Courts Library Porn Filter Makes Sense
    From: skat_private (Stephen Keating)
    
    "The Supreme Court's ruling today that obligates public libraries to filter 
    out Internet porn is, on balance, the right decision," said Stephen 
    Keating, executive director of the Privacy Foundation, based at the 
    University of Denver. "The issue of privacy cuts both ways in this debate. 
    Library patrons should have relatively unfettered access to the Internet 
    without worrying about authorities monitoring their clickstream."
    "However, public libraries do not typically carry pornographic magazines 
    and videos in their collections. Why not? In part, because those materials 
    would offend the modesty and privacy of a large number of patrons, 
    including minors."
    "There is a slipperly slope argument to be made about whether library 
    Internet filtering will be go too far and block legitimate content. That's 
    a proper subject for local communities and their citizens to resolve."
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jun 24 2003 - 23:04:41 PDT