FC: Should we care about what happens to expiring dot.com domains?

From: Declan McCullagh (declanat_private)
Date: Thu Jul 24 2003 - 22:35:24 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "FC: Twila Brase on health care privacy -- or lack of it"

    ---
    
    Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 20:49:18 -0700
    From: Ali Farshchian <aliat_private>
    Subject: Just how big is the Domain Name WLS Controversy?
    To: declanat_private
    
    Declan,
    
    CircleID has done a special coverage of Wait Listing Service (WLS)
    Controversy over Domain Names involving ICANN and VeriSign -- we have been
    gathering some facts and industry commentary which might be of interest to
    you and Politech readers.
    
    Just how big is the Domain Name WLS Controversy?
    Here are some hints...
    
    -------------------------------------------------------
    Facts & Figures:
    -------------------------------------------------------
    - About 25,000 domain names are deleted each day
    - Roughly 80 to 100 million inquiries are made per day in order to snatch
    deleted .com/.net domains
    - Around 40% of registered domain names are deleted each year
    - Total number of .com/.net domains registered is approximately 26,500,000
    - A 5-year WLS contract is estimated to generate $100 to $150 million for
    the service provider (does not include registry revenues).
    - WLS is scheduled to launch on Oct. 11, 2003
    
    -------------------------------------------------------
    Industry Commentary
    Source: http://www.circleid.com
    -------------------------------------------------------
    - Elana Broitman, Director of Policy, Register.com:
    "We are concerned about some of the conditions currently being considered by
    ICANN - primarily, the 'black out period' ...We consider this a condition
    that could confuse consumers and dampen domain name competition."
    http://www.circleid.com/article/180_0_1_0_C/
    
    - Elliot Noss, President & CEO, Tucows Inc:
    "Verisign is paid a sum of money to perform a service. They own neither the
    primary nor the secondary data ...The implication of this conclusion as it
    relates to WLS is that any re-registration market service is outside the
    scope of the original contract and should be treated as any new service
    should."
    http://www.circleid.com/article/175_0_1_0_C/
    
    - Michael Mann, President of BuyDomains.com:
    "Also disturbing is that the WLS ultimately proposes selling an option on
    someone else's property -- there is oftentimes no service even performed if
    the name is renewed by its owner."
    http://www.circleid.com/article/182_0_1_0_C/
    
    - Mason Cole, VP Marketing & Corporate Communications, SnapNames, Inc:
    "Why the WLS is Better for Consumers...Today's makeshift system for domain
    name reservations -- comprised of dozens of providers trying to get names
    the very moment they become available again -- gives customers value, but
    it's still very hard to reserve and secure a name."
    http://www.circleid.com/article/181_0_1_0_C/
    
    - Mark Jeftovic, President & Co-Founder, easyDNS Technologies Inc:
    "Verisign's implementation of WLS looks a lot like an abuse of monopoly
    power: the creation of a "digital derivative" instrument sold at a 400%
    markup over the underlying asset, while locking out any competition in the
    process."
    http://www.circleid.com/article/176_0_1_0_C/
    
    - Jay Westerdal, President, Name Intelligence:
    "A more perfect solution to the problem might be...people could register
    '.comfailsafe', a domain that would not resolve on the Internet...Verisign
    has proven they can run a registry, so why not just propose a shadow
    registry with all the rules of a regular registry. Everything from transfers
    to WIPO."
    http://www.circleid.com/article/196_0_1_0_C/
    
    - Roger Collins, President, Afternic.com:
    "A positive consequence of this debate is that domain name owners will gain
    knowledge about the value of their domains."
    http://www.circleid.com/article/177_0_1_0_C/
    
    -------------------------------------------------------
    Public Opinion
    -------------------------------------------------------
    - Further comments are also submitted here:
    http://www.circleid.com/article/166_0_1_0_C/
    
    
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
    You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
    This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
    Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 24 2003 - 23:23:52 PDT