[Politech] Barbra Streisand loses suit against californiacoastline.org [fs][priv]

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Thu Jan 01 2004 - 21:54:45 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "[Politech] Andrew Odlyzko on pricing and architecture of the Internet"

    ---
    
    Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:39:55 -0500 (EST)
    From: Jon Abolins <jda-ir@private>
    To: Declan McCullagh <declan@private>
    Subject: Streisand aerial photo case & freedom of speech
    
    FYI. Don't have time to comment on it today but I figured that this
    article would be of privacy and free speech interest to the Politech
    readers.
    
    J.D. Abolins
    
    ----------
    URL: http://www.malibutimes.com/articles/2003/12/10/news/news6.txt
    
    The Malibu Times
    News
    
    Streisand's invasion of privacy lawsuit washes up
    [...]
    By Massiel Ladron De Guevara/Special to The Malibu Times
    
    Malibu resident Barbra Streisand's invasion-of-privacy lawsuit against
    amateur photographer Kenneth Adelman washed up in a Los Angeles
    superior court Wednesday.
    
    Superior Court Judge Allen J. Goodman threw out the $10 million-dollar
    lawsuit, requesting Adelman to remove an aerial photo he snapped of
    Streisand's bluff-top estate from among the 12,700 photos posted on
    his Web site, www.californiacoastline.org. In a tentative 46-page
    ruling, Goodman wrote Streisand's privacy had not been invaded by the
    retired software engineer who began photographing the California
    coastline to aid in its preservation.
    
    "The published image [of Streisand's home] represents the exercise of
    Adelman's First Amendment rights in connection with a public issue and
    an issue of public interest," Goodman wrote. "The California coastline
    is far from a private place ... The purpose and function of the
    photograph and its publication on the California Coastal Records
    Project Web site are examples of speech protected by the state and
    federal constitutions."
    [...]
    Frustrated with the ruling, Streisand's attorney, John Gatti claims
    the main point of Streisand's case was never addressed.
    
    "The decision ignored Ms. Streisand's main complaint, that her name is
    used on the site to identify her home as hers, while tens of thousands
    of other home owners are accorded anonymity," Gatti said. "The court
    did what it did, and focused on what it focused on, but the point
    remains, Ms. Streisand undertook this action because she sought to
    reaffirm that everyone should retain the right to preserve their
    privacy and security, even in this technologically invasive age."
    
    <rest of article snipped>
    _______________________________________________
    Politech mailing list
    Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 22:45:28 PST