[Politech] Texas atty general sides with open government over privacy [priv]

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Sun Feb 29 2004 - 19:58:01 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "[Politech] India tries electronic voting -- with 668 million people"

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: Texas Atty Genl "rejects" strong federal medical-privacy law
    Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 16:03:47 -0800
    From: Jim Warren <jwarren@private>
    To: Dave Farber:;, Declan McCullagh <declan@private>
    References: <40424C37.2D1643AF@private>
    
    An interesting clash between (1) open-government vs.
    personal-privacy, and (2) state's rights vs. federal authority.  --jim
    
    At 12:34 PM -0800 2/29/04, pmarshall <pwm@private> posted to
    med-privacy@private:
    
    >TEXAS AG SAYS NO TO HIPAA: Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott ruled
    >Friday that the state's public information law takes
    >precedence over a far-reaching federal medical privacy law, a legal
    >opinion he called the strongest in the nation.
    >
    >His decision means Texas media outlets and individuals will have access
    >to public information that some hospitals and authorities have
    >declined to release under the Federal Health Insurance Portability and
    >Accountability Act, known as HIPAA.
    >
    >"In Texas, government records are presumed open unless a specific
    >exception applies. HIPAA is not an exception to the rule of openness in
    >the state of Texas," Abbott told the board of directors of the Freedom
    >of Information Foundation of Texas at The Associated Press'
    >Dallas bureau, where he released his legal opinion.
    >
    >HIPAA, a sweeping overhaul of the federal health care privacy laws that
    >took effect in April, has frustrated journalists and others who
    >have found most basic information hard to come by.
    >
    >"What this means is, governmental bodies who've been using HIPAA as a
    >shield just lost that protection," Abbott said.
    >
    >Abbott said Texas authorities worked closely on the language of the
    >ruling with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which
    >created the privacy regulations under the law. Still, he said, he
    >wouldn't be surprised if the ruling were challenged in court.
    >
    >http://www.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/news/state/7950211.htm
    >
    >[FOI Advocate]
    >
    >_______________________________________________
    >Med-privacy mailing list
    >Med-privacy@private
    >http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/med-privacy
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Politech mailing list
    Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Feb 29 2004 - 20:09:44 PST