[Politech] Privacy International on dangers of biometric passports [priv]

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Tue Mar 30 2004 - 07:34:29 PST

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "[Politech] Replies to FBI, key logging, and wiretap double standards [priv]"

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: 	biometric passports
    Date: 	Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:27:19 +0100
    From: 	Gus Hosein <gus@private>
    To: 	declan
    
    
    
    Hi Declan...
    
    Here is a press release that we sent out last night regarding the 
    development of biometric passports.  It is a form of multilateralism, that 
    is growing.
    
    Keep well...
    
    gus.
    
    http://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/terrorism/rpt/icaopressrelease.html
    
    PRIVACY INTERNATIONAL
    MEDIA RELEASE
    
    Files & Biometric Identifiers on More Than a Billion Passengers to be 
    Computerised and Shared Globally by 2015
    
    Civil rights groups warn of grave dangers in International biometric 
    passport system.
    
    29th March 2004
    
    Embargo: 22.00 hrs GMT, 29th March 2004
    
    A wide range of privacy, human rights & civil liberties organisations 
    throughout the world have signed an open letter expressing grave concerns 
    over a global biometric identity system being established on behalf of 
    governments by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO).
    
    The letter, spearheaded by Privacy International and the American Civil 
    Liberties Union (ACLU) raises concerns about little-known plans to 
    imminently create international standards that will require the use of 
    biometrics and RFID (radio frequency) technology in all future passports. 
    The measures, being decided this week at a meeting of the ICAO in Cairo, 
    will result in a distributed international identification database on all 
    passport holders.
    
    The open letter has been signed by, among others, Statewatch, the UK based 
    Foundation for Information Policy research, The Association for Progressive 
    Communications and the US based Privacy Rights Clearinghouse. The range of 
    originating countries includes, among others, Australia, Canada, Germany, 
    Korea, Nigeria and Swizterland.
    
    The ICAO has agreed that the initial international biometric standard for 
    passports will be facial mapping. Adequate memory space in newly issued 
    passports will be reserved for additional biometrics such as fingerprinting 
    at the discretion of every government. The EU is already calling for 
    fingerprints to be included, along with an associated European register of 
    all biometrics. National authorities will store and share these vast data 
    reserves.
    
    The measures, supported by the US and the EU, will ultimately create an 
    electronic ID system on hundreds of millions of travellers. Despite serious 
    implications for privacy and personal security, the process is occurring 
    without public engagement or debate. Rather than allowing this important 
    issue to be decided by parliaments, governments have delegated the setting 
    of standards to the ICAO, a UN-level organization that is responsible for 
    the standardization of travel documents, passenger data systems and air 
    travel requirements.
    
    The legislative drivers for the ICAO system are already in place. The 
    USA-PATRIOT Act, passed by the U.S. Congress after the events of September 
    2001 included the requirement that the President certify a biometric 
    technology standard for use in identifying aliens seeking admission into 
    the U.S., within two years. The schedule for its implementation was 
    accelerated by another piece of legislation, the little known Enhanced 
    Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act 2002. Part of this second law 
    included seeking international co-operation with this standard:
    
    "By October 26, 2004, in order for a country to remain eligible for 
    participation in the visa waiver program its government must certify that 
    it has a program to issue to its nationals machine-readable passports that 
    are tamper-resistant and which incorporate biometric and authentication 
    identifiers that satisfy the standards of the International Civil Aviation 
    Organization (ICAO)."
    
    These laws gave momentum to the standards that were being considered at the 
    ICAO by requiring visa waiver countries (which include many EU countries, 
    Australia, Brunei, Iceland, Japan, Monaco, New Zealand, Norway, Singapore, 
    and Slovenia) to implement biometrics into their Machine-Readable Travel 
    Documents (MRTDs), i.e. passports.
    
    Based on projections from current passport and travel statistics, biometric 
    details of more than a billion people will be electronically stored by 
    2015. Some of the countries sampled for this estimate are:
    United States	90 million
    United Kingdom	54 million
    Japan	64 million
    Canada	24 million
    Australia	13 million
    Russian Federation	50 million
    Ireland	4 million
    Taiwan	17 million
    China	60 million
    
    The Privacy International open letter warns:
    
    "We are increasingly concerned that the biometric travel document 
    initiative is part and parcel of a larger surveillance infrastructure 
    monitoring the movement of individuals globally that includes 
    Passenger-Name Record transfers, API systems and the creation of an 
    intergovernmental network of interoperable electronic data systems to 
    facilitate access to each country's law enforcement and intelligence 
    information."
    
    Privacy International has warned of "unprecedented" security threats that 
    could arise from the plan because of potential access by terrorists and 
    organised crime. Furthermore, the biometric standard being adopted is 
    "fundamentally flawed" and will result in a substantial number of 
    passengers being falsely identified as potential terrorists or wrongly 
    accused of holding fraudulent passports.
    
    Dr Gus Hosein, Senior Fellow with Privacy International, warned: "This is a 
    potentially perilous plan. The ICAO must go back to the drawing board or 
    hold itself responsible for creating the first truly global biometric 
    database".
    
    "Governments may claim that they are under an international obligation to 
    create national databases of fingerprints and face scans but we will soon 
    see nations with appalling human rights records generating massive 
    databases, and then requiring our own fingerprints and face-scans as we 
    travel."
    
    He continued: "In January 2004 when the U.S. began fingerprinting and 
    face-scanning foreign visitors and storing this data for over fifty years 
    under the US-VISIT program, many countries responded with alarm. With the 
    biometric passport, however, every country may have its own surveillance 
    system, accumulating fingerprints and face-scans and keeping them for as 
    long as they wish with no regard to privacy or civil liberties."
    
    Notes to editors:
    
    The open letter is available at
    
    http://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/terrorism/rpt/icaoletter.pdf
    
    and a background information package is available at
    
    http://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/terrorism/rpt/icaobackground.html
    
    Contact Information:
    
    Simon Davies, Director
    Privacy International, +44 (0)7958 466 552 email simon@private
    
    Gus Hosein, Senior Fellow
    Privacy International, +44 (0)20 7955 6403 email gus@private
    
    Passport statistics and projections have been derived from the following 
    sources:
    
        * United States: http://travel.state.gov/passport_statistics.html
        * United Kingdom: http://www.ukpa.gov.uk/images/UKPS_plans_03-08.pdf
        * Japan: 
    http://www2.tjnet.co.jp/intl/news/000214-28/specialreport1.html#anchor672995
        * Canada: http://www.ppt.gc.ca/faq/index_e.asp#150
        * Australia: http://www.dfat.gov.au/dept/annual_reports/99_00/2/2/2.1.html
        * Russian Federation: 
    http://www.gks.ru/scripts/free/1c.exe?XXXX68F.4.1/010120R
        * Ireland: 
    http://www.politics.ie/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2757
        * Taiwan: 
    http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:GSkSd0uIgOkJ:www.chinatopnews.com/Politics/Tue_Apr_18_11_47_33_2000.html+taiwan+%22passports+issued%22+lost+stolen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
        * China: 
    http://www.chinaonline.com/industry/tourism/NewsArchive/cs-protected/2001/February/c01020555.asp
    
    Privacy International (PI) www.privacyinternational.org is a human rights 
    group formed in 1990 as a watchdog on surveillance by governments and 
    corporations. PI is based in London, and has an office in Washington, D.C. 
    Together with members in 40 countries, PI has conducted campaigns 
    throughout the world on issues ranging from wiretapping and national 
    security activities, to ID cards, video surveillance, data matching, police 
    information systems, and medical privacy, and works with a wide range of 
    parliamentary and inter-governmental organisations such as the European 
    Parliament, the House of Lords and UNESCO.
    
    
    ----- End forwarded message -----
    _______________________________________________
    Politech mailing list
    Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Mar 30 2004 - 07:33:26 PST