[Politech] Weekly column: Why Congress can't code good tech laws

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 12:15:41 PDT

  • Next message: Declan McCullagh: "[Politech] When search engines take the stand: Courts go Googling"

    http://news.com.com/2010-1014_3-5209091.html
    
    Bad laws, bad code, bad behavior
    May 10, 2004, 10:00 AM PT
    By Declan McCullagh
    
    A congressional hearing on Internet porn last week illustrates what 
    happens when politicians try to ban technology they don't like or 
    understand.
    
    The topic of Thursday's meeting of the House of Representatives' 
    consumer protection subcommittee was a bill intended to require that 
    programs like Kazaa and Grokster obtain parental consent before 
    installation. Peer-to-peer software is starting "to lure our children 
    from the perceived safety of the family living room out into the dangers 
    of the Internet wilderness," subcommittee chairman Cliff Stearns, 
    R-Fla., warned.
    
    The only problem: The bill that Stearns and his colleagues suggest as a 
    solution is so broadly worded that it regulates far more than just 
    peer-to-peer applications. Anyone distributing instant-messaging 
    programs, File Transfer Protocol software or Internet Relay Chat clients 
    would have to follow a complicated set of regulations to be published by 
    the Federal Trade Commission, which might as well be renamed the Federal 
    Software Regulatory Commission.
    
    Software distribution sites like those of SourceForge and the 
    Comprehensive Perl Archive Network would be outlawed, if they did not 
    follow these byzantine legal rules, which include obtaining "verifiable 
    parental consent," if the downloader is a minor, ensuring that the 
    software can be readily uninstalled, keeping "records of its compliance" 
    and so on. Anyone running such a Web site outside the United States 
    would be required to hire a "resident agent" and file reports with the 
    FTC--hardly a boon to the burgeoning global open-source movement.
    
    The so-called Protecting Children from Peer-to-Peer Pornography Act is 
    just one example of politicians attempting to write rules for 
    software--often with a worthwhile goal in mind--that end up hurting 
    legitimate programmers, network administrators and end users. In other 
    words, state and federal laws regulating technology often invoke an even 
    more powerful rule: the law of unintended consequences.
    
    [...remainder snipped...]
    _______________________________________________
    Politech mailing list
    Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
    Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu May 13 2004 - 12:39:41 PDT