[I don't know enough about what happened at the UN meeting to have any specific reaction (I wasn't at this one). My general feeling is that improving government cooperation against spammers is likely to do more good than harm, and the UN is one potential vehicle for it. Then again, the number of spammers blocked or put out of business by any government anywhere seems tiny. We don't have time to wait a decade or even five years for a international anti-spam treaty. Technical countermeasures including domainkeys/SPF are by far the quickest and most efficient ways of dealing with spam right now. --Declan] -------- Original Message -------- Subject: UN/spam Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:09:19 -0700 From: Da'ud X Mohammed <webmaster@private> Organization: Oregon Coast News Signal To: declan@private Hullo Declan, I'm sure Politech readers would look forward to your take on the UN/spam story - there were 200+ out there. I chose this one at near-random http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,2964829a28,00.html Thanks With peace dxm _______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 23:08:46 PDT