Some background on John's lawsuit is here: http://papersplease.org/gilmore/ -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Politech] Analysis of new driver's license/national ID House bill [priv] Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:50:01 -0800 From: John Gilmore <gnu@private> To: Declan McCullagh <declan@private> CC: politech@private James Plummer forgot one important thing about the national networked ID card the Feds are trying to create. The Federal government can't force state governments to do anything about this. It's the choice of the states whether to become more intrusive or less intrusive about their citizens' privacy. Here's the catch. If your state doesn't knuckle under to the Feds, nobody from your state will be allowed to travel after the deadline. The "intel bill" (9/11 Intelligence Reorg law) specifies that non- compliant IDs will not be accepted "for federal purposes" after two years. Getting TSA's permission to get on a plane is a "federal purpose". In a non-insane country, the Federal government would be unable to threaten to take away its citizens' right to travel inside the country. The right to travel is protected by the Constitution (you can't assemble unless you can travel) and by many Supreme Court decisions. But the courts have taken years to chew on this question, and meanwhile there are guys with guns in airports and train stations, keeping ME from traveling. Most people just don't believe their OWN travel will ever be restricted by the Federal government, therefore they don't protest. When they have living proof, it'll be too late. John _______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Tue Feb 08 2005 - 22:38:43 PST