[Politech] Progress and Freedom Foundation: Leave DMCA alone, don't permit circumvention! [ip]

From: Declan McCullagh (declan@private)
Date: Thu Oct 06 2005 - 12:10:55 PDT


In Patrick Ross' commentary below, TPM=technical protection measures, 
aka anti-copying mechanisms.

I think Ross is misguided, irresponsibly overstates the alleged harm of 
permitting circumvention for fair use, and ignores the documented 
problems caused by the DMCA. A more rigorous free-market approach is here:
http://www.politechbot.com/2005/06/13/new-article-on/

But nevertheless, the Progress and Freedom Foundation is an influential 
think tank with many fans among Republicans on Capitol Hill. (PFF 
recently hired Michael Powell's legal advisor, for instance, and its 
board is primarily former Reagan administration officials.) No wonder 
DMCA reform is going nowhere.

-Declan

---

http://news.com.com/2010-1025_3-5889596.html

Here's a surefire way to stifle innovation
By Patrick Ross
Published: October 6, 2005, 4:00 AM PDT

...A well-meaning U.S. Congressman, Rick Boucher of Virginia, is the 
author of the legislation in question. He first tried to make 
circumvention of copy-protection mechanisms legal back in 1998, when 
Congress was debating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. His effort 
to amend the bill failed.

Since then, he has been continuing his crusade through standalone bills; 
his version in this Congress is HR-1201. Boucher claims that digital 
rights management (DRM) on DVDs, CDs and other mediums can stifle fair 
use. The U.S. Copyright Office largely has disagreed in DMCA review 
proceedings, but Boucher nonetheless persists...

But if HR-1201 becomes law, every consumer could legally hack any TPM by 
claiming fair use, and as fair use isn't codified, there would be as 
many definitions of it as there are consumers. Consumers would be 
legally sanctioned to break their contracts with the content provider.

No sane business operator enters a contract in which one party has the 
right to disregard its terms at will, but that's what HR-1201 permits. 
That hated TPM would disappear from the market, as there's no reason to 
employ a lock if everyone has a legal right to the key. But as TPM 
leaves, so do the digital offerings that come with it...

_______________________________________________
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Thu Oct 06 2005 - 12:27:56 PDT