-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Jesus Spammer Charles Carlson Tries On A SLAPP Suit
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:54:58 -0600 (CST)
From: J.A. Terranson <measl@private>
To: declan@private
Hi Declan,
http://www.mfn.org/~measl/pdf/Carlson_complaint.pdf
you will find a roughly 30 page rambling "complaint" from the infamous
Chuck Carlson (aka "StraitGate Ministries", "WHTT", and scroes of others,
I'm sure), attempting to argue that Jesus Spam is constitionally protected
speech provided it is compliant with the CANSPAM act, and that people who
complain about receiving his unsolicited Spams-For-Jesus are "committing
Internet Defamation" by complaining.
Chuckie screwed up his first two attempts to serve me in this
case, and below you will find my email to him laying out the proper way to
get his day in court (assuming he really *wants* a day in court, and not
just to be able to claim that he is "suing Pharisees" (he runs the website
"Pharisee Watch" keep keep an eye on all of us decadent "Pharisees" you
know!).
As I am in Missouri, and Chuck is in Arizona, I paid particularly
close attention to the failed service I have - and in so doing I noticed
something I had never seen before: The Arizona Court requires a defendant
to pony up $190.00 just to answer the complaint and avoid a default
judgement. It seems to me this is an unconstitutional tax imposed to
limit defendant's access to the courts out in Arizona, but then, what does
an old Cypherpunk know of laws and taxes and Constitutions???
This may have an interest for your Politech readers.
All the best!
//Alif
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@private
0xBD4A95BF
Just once, can't we have a nice polite discussion about
the logistics and planning side of large criminal enterprise?
- Steve Thompson
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:42:13 -0600 (CST)
From: J.A. Terranson <measl@private>
Subject: [Antisocial] The Pharisee lawsuit Continues!
See below.
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@private
0xBD4A95BF
Just once, can't we have a nice polite discussion about
the logistics and planning side of large criminal enterprise?
- Steve Thompson
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:41:21 -0600 (CST)
From: J.A. Terranson <measl@private>
To: carlsonwhtt@private
Cc: measl@private
Subject: Your lawsuit against "Missouri Freenet Corporation'
Hi Chuck,
As you requested, here is an email to memorialize what we just
discussed on the telephone.
(1) A young lady was handed a subpoena for "Missouri Freenet Corporation".
this subpoena is for the suit you filed recently in Arizona.
(2) After reading your complaint I think I understand what you're trying
to do: your're trying to sue *me*, personally, for writing an email
which made statements you disagreed with. Unfortunately for you:
(3) There is no "Missouri Freenet Corporation". There *was* one at one
time, a LONG time ago, but it was dissolved *years* ago. Nowadays, there
is only the internet domain "MFN.ORG", which is what I think you are
referring to as "Missouri Freenet Corporation".
(4) Like you, I am eager to participate in this lawsuit. Unfortunately, I
cannot respond to the summons on my desk, because it is addressed to a
corporation, and not to me - even if such a corporation existed, it would
be illegal for me to answer on their behalf (as I'm sure you know).
(5) As things stand now, you could, in theory, take a default judgement
against "Missouri Freenet Corporation". But that wouldn't do you any
good, as there is no such thing. There are no assets, no liabilities, no
officers, employees, etc. There is NO "MISSOURI FREENET CORPORATION".
There is an old abandoned web page which has not changed in about 9 years
(check this out for yourself at archive.org) that is hosted here at
mfn.org, but that is not going to help your cause any.
(6) If you really want to get your day in court on this issue, you're
going to have to sue the person you're actually pissed off at - that would
be me. just to make life easy on you, here is all the information you'll
need to accomplish this momentus feat:
- Change the named defendant from "Missouri Freenet Corporation" to "Alif
Terranson, occasionally doing business as "MFN.ORG" or "Missouri FreeNet".
- Change the address from whatever you have now to where I live: 6455
Alamo Avenue, Clayton, Missouri, 63105. S
- have a new subpoena issue that names me personally, and have it
delivered to the above address. If the process server calls me on my cell
phone, I will arrange to be there to receive process: (618) 558-5854.
If you'll do all that, I'll be pleased as punch to see you in court, where
you can battle out your sickness in public.
If you don't do this, I will publicize this email far and wide, to show
that you are a coward and deliberately avoided naming me personally, so as
to avoid losing in a public case which you started.
Have a nice day Chuckie.
//Alif
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@private
0xBD4A95BF
Just once, can't we have a nice polite discussion about
the logistics and planning side of large criminal enterprise?
- Steve Thompson
_______________________________________________
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sat Dec 24 2005 - 10:51:43 PST